From the moment I woke up, the only thing that was on my mind was prom. I still had a whole day ahead of me to get ready but I was both anxious and nervous about the event. I had a typical image of what prom would be like but I would never know for sure. How was I supposed to act? Was I dressing up too much or too little? How would people see me? I realize now that these thoughts of appearance were something that was mentioned in the prom unit. We tend to put so much money and time into making ourselves look the best for this one special day. The event of prom has influenced me to do the same. Another thing I noticed that was the same with what I learned from the unit was the photos and cameras. Everyone had a camera. And everyone took photos of each other. I also brought a camera and tried to take as many pictures as possible. Since we obsess with the idea that prom is a ‘one in a lifetime’ experience, we try to capture those memories with photos. Aside from that though, I think another reason why we obsess with taking photos at prom is because everyone was dressed up. If it wasn’t for prom, we would not have put so much effort in our clothes, make-up, and hair. I personally wanted to take photos of people who dressed so differently and pretty because prom is the only high school event where we have to really care for our appearances.
Another thing people tend to worry about is having prom dates. The event makes it seem as though we cannot fully enjoy prom without a date or an escort. I learned that this is a huge misconception. Couples that really love each other will obviously make prom their special night, but it was also a special night for me as well. I really liked how different everyone looked and how the place looked as well. I enjoyed dancing with my group of friends I came with, and occasionally danced with others. I also had a misconception that it would be awkward to dance with couples- this is not true especially if they’re friends with me. Prom didn’t have to be romantic and I honestly felt really glad for coming.
After attending prom, I feel as though I developed a more positive attitude towards it. Though it is a little too expensive and can be stressful to prepare for, the event itself did feel special. If you put the effort in dancing with crowds and ask to take photos with others, people notice and you feel less distanced from certain people. There is more to high school than prom, but I also feel as though prom is a final event (besides graduation) that puts people together and realize that there’s not much time left before we leave SOF. That’s also why we take as many photos and dance so we really can enjoy the night. Another off-base idea was this typical image of certain people just sitting/standing off to the side and not enjoying their time at prom. Everyone was on the dance floor, and we only sat when we ate and when we were too tired.
Learning about prom in a scholarly way did not really affect anything personally. I was more focused on just having a good time and really value the limited time with others. I already knew it’s a bit weird in a way to dress up, try to get escorts, and somehow think this is some passageway to adulthood-an idea that I now disagree with. Prom was just a finale dance party to me and that was fine. Prom was actually better than I had hoped because of our school, though at the same time it didn’t really matter. I just wanted to dance with as many people as possible so I wouldn’t regret just standing to the side and watch others dance.
Friday, May 27, 2011
Tuesday, May 24, 2011
HW#58: Prom Interviews
Person who has not been to Prom:
She will be going to prom but is more excited about hanging out with her group of friends afterwards than the actual prom. She thinks that prom can go both ways: some people will enjoy the day and some people will hate being there. Prom is a nice day to see friends and attempt to make good memories with. As for the dominant social practice of the pressure of having 'prom dates' she did say that its nice to have a date but its not necessary-though this contradicts with what she says in casual conversations. She mentions that it looks really nice to see close couples coming to prom, but prom does not seem as fun when you just go with no date. She finds prom and the DSP of prom very stressful. She spent a lot of money to look her best, initiated plans with her friends about what to do about how to get there and what to do after prom. I believe she is also under the pressure of not having a date-especially when she talks to people who are taking their boyfriends/girlfriends over to the event. She does not expect prom to be very exciting personally not only because of the lack of having a date, but because she feels uncomfortable with the kind of dancing typical teenagers do and much prefers something like ballroom dancing.
Person who have been to Prom:
The first person I thought about interviewing was a friend that graduated high school 2 years ago who had mentioned about prom being a nice experience. He wore a purple suit and went for casualness. His 'prom date' was a close friend. Though he wasn't particularly enthusiastic about going and was forced by parents, he wasn't at the same time avoiding prom. Though he enjoyed prom, he does think that the dominant social practices of prom a little too exaggerated. Though he did say that prom is an experience we look back on as a significant part of our high school life,"It isn’t going to be one of those things that you’ll only experience once in your life time. It’ll maybe be once in your high school life. Even then, that’s questionable seeing as how kids are inspired to do other things by the media. It is an exaggeration, just like education is to a certain extent. It’s nice to have (to go), but it’s not absolutely necessary. You won’t be missing out on anything in the long run unless it’s the sociability that you really care about." On a side note, he mentioned the only thing about his prom he disliked was the accident where his date's hair caught on fire from candles and 'It smelled pretty bad.' I also asked about his opinion about the expensive aspect of prom, and he said that it wasn't absolutely necessary to over spend to look beautiful. It's nice though, to use that as a confidence booster for the night.
Someone significantly older than me:
She has never been to prom, being that her high school is in Japan which does not even have prom. That is why though, that she (in a way) admires and looks up to this idea of prom. I remember when I told her maybe prom will be canceled, she got extremely upset-as though prom really is that much of a big deal. She says that the dominant social practices are about looking amazing and the phrase that it is a once in a lifetime moment. Though the social practice of having a date would be nice, she doesn't think that is the point of prom. Prom is just about enjoying the whole night with friends and that it will be a memory to look back on. She does not question about these DSP's though, she simply accepts them as is and tells me that I should look forward and really make the great memories that prom seems to make. For once, she does not care about curfews and not going to school the next day. She takes prom seriously, as though it really is the 'once in a lifetime experience.'
Analysis:
Most people and including my interviewees would have similar/the same understandings of what prom is 'typically' like. People would dress nice, spend a lot of money, and go to create an important memory of their high school life. There were some opposing opinions within my interviewees though. The girl that is going to prom spent a lot of money but the guy who actually went to prom actually told me he 'rented a suit' and didn't obsess over appearances. My parent is obviously obsessed about me looking my best and though I usually do not care about appearance too much, her opinions have influenced my feelings toward prom. When thinking about the 'having a date' DSP, all interviewees did not find it necessary to have one, though it would be nice. Besides the parent, the two interviewees found the 'once in a lifetime' idea a bit too exaggerated which I found interesting. Prom is nice, but it is not absolutely necessary is the general idea I got from interviewing a few people about their opinions.
She will be going to prom but is more excited about hanging out with her group of friends afterwards than the actual prom. She thinks that prom can go both ways: some people will enjoy the day and some people will hate being there. Prom is a nice day to see friends and attempt to make good memories with. As for the dominant social practice of the pressure of having 'prom dates' she did say that its nice to have a date but its not necessary-though this contradicts with what she says in casual conversations. She mentions that it looks really nice to see close couples coming to prom, but prom does not seem as fun when you just go with no date. She finds prom and the DSP of prom very stressful. She spent a lot of money to look her best, initiated plans with her friends about what to do about how to get there and what to do after prom. I believe she is also under the pressure of not having a date-especially when she talks to people who are taking their boyfriends/girlfriends over to the event. She does not expect prom to be very exciting personally not only because of the lack of having a date, but because she feels uncomfortable with the kind of dancing typical teenagers do and much prefers something like ballroom dancing.
Person who have been to Prom:
The first person I thought about interviewing was a friend that graduated high school 2 years ago who had mentioned about prom being a nice experience. He wore a purple suit and went for casualness. His 'prom date' was a close friend. Though he wasn't particularly enthusiastic about going and was forced by parents, he wasn't at the same time avoiding prom. Though he enjoyed prom, he does think that the dominant social practices of prom a little too exaggerated. Though he did say that prom is an experience we look back on as a significant part of our high school life,"It isn’t going to be one of those things that you’ll only experience once in your life time. It’ll maybe be once in your high school life. Even then, that’s questionable seeing as how kids are inspired to do other things by the media. It is an exaggeration, just like education is to a certain extent. It’s nice to have (to go), but it’s not absolutely necessary. You won’t be missing out on anything in the long run unless it’s the sociability that you really care about." On a side note, he mentioned the only thing about his prom he disliked was the accident where his date's hair caught on fire from candles and 'It smelled pretty bad.' I also asked about his opinion about the expensive aspect of prom, and he said that it wasn't absolutely necessary to over spend to look beautiful. It's nice though, to use that as a confidence booster for the night.
Someone significantly older than me:
She has never been to prom, being that her high school is in Japan which does not even have prom. That is why though, that she (in a way) admires and looks up to this idea of prom. I remember when I told her maybe prom will be canceled, she got extremely upset-as though prom really is that much of a big deal. She says that the dominant social practices are about looking amazing and the phrase that it is a once in a lifetime moment. Though the social practice of having a date would be nice, she doesn't think that is the point of prom. Prom is just about enjoying the whole night with friends and that it will be a memory to look back on. She does not question about these DSP's though, she simply accepts them as is and tells me that I should look forward and really make the great memories that prom seems to make. For once, she does not care about curfews and not going to school the next day. She takes prom seriously, as though it really is the 'once in a lifetime experience.'
Analysis:
Most people and including my interviewees would have similar/the same understandings of what prom is 'typically' like. People would dress nice, spend a lot of money, and go to create an important memory of their high school life. There were some opposing opinions within my interviewees though. The girl that is going to prom spent a lot of money but the guy who actually went to prom actually told me he 'rented a suit' and didn't obsess over appearances. My parent is obviously obsessed about me looking my best and though I usually do not care about appearance too much, her opinions have influenced my feelings toward prom. When thinking about the 'having a date' DSP, all interviewees did not find it necessary to have one, though it would be nice. Besides the parent, the two interviewees found the 'once in a lifetime' idea a bit too exaggerated which I found interesting. Prom is nice, but it is not absolutely necessary is the general idea I got from interviewing a few people about their opinions.
Saturday, May 21, 2011
HW#57: Initial Thoughts on Prom
Prom is nothing more than a fancy dance party. And yet, it is an event most people look forward to, to enjoy and to look back to as a high school memory. I'm looking forward to prom because I think prom is like a pre-graduation celebration. I like the idea of a little party after 4 years of studying and stressing about colleges. I think the reason why people make it such a big deal is because we want to do something with everyone involved as a school before seperating to different paths in life. I think that is also the reason why we're obsessed with taking photos of prom. I also think though, that maybe I'm being pressured to go to prom because society makes a big deal out of it. My mother is excited about my prom and wants me to go so I can 'have great memories with high school friends.' I also feel as though if I don't go, there will be people who'll ask why I didn't go to my prom--and I would end up regretting not going. Our culture is obsessed with the idea of that one in a lifetime event. I don't find this opinion wrong in any way though.
I just find some aspects of prom a little too much though. I don't understand why so much money have to be put into one day. I don't think its necessary, and yet we are pressured to look our best. There is also the dominant belief that everyone needs a prom date. At first I was also affected by that pressure but at this point I am content with not having a 'date'. I look forward to the event regardless because I'll still be able to have a fun time with friends and classmates. I think prom should not be so hectic as society makes it seem. It shouldn't even have a huge name like 'prom.' I think a dance party with everyone just to have fun is a better idea than just being pressured to have escorts and spend hundreds of dollars to look amazing.
Questions:
1. Where did prom orignate? What started prom?
2. Is there a less stresful but still memorable alternative than 'prom'?
3. What other events do other countries do to celebrate the closing senior year?
I just find some aspects of prom a little too much though. I don't understand why so much money have to be put into one day. I don't think its necessary, and yet we are pressured to look our best. There is also the dominant belief that everyone needs a prom date. At first I was also affected by that pressure but at this point I am content with not having a 'date'. I look forward to the event regardless because I'll still be able to have a fun time with friends and classmates. I think prom should not be so hectic as society makes it seem. It shouldn't even have a huge name like 'prom.' I think a dance party with everyone just to have fun is a better idea than just being pressured to have escorts and spend hundreds of dollars to look amazing.
Questions:
1. Where did prom orignate? What started prom?
2. Is there a less stresful but still memorable alternative than 'prom'?
3. What other events do other countries do to celebrate the closing senior year?
Tuesday, May 17, 2011
HW#56: Culminating Project Comments
To Ben: (from T/W group)
http://ben11thgradehistoryblog.blogspot.com/
"While reading Stiff, one of the topics that bothered me the most was donating our bodies to science. This post was really interesting and well-written. I was surprised to see that even recently, there are problems as the one you mentioned with the crematorium. "The article also states that over 16,000 lawsuits have been filed over the past 19 years arguing that the body parts of people's loved ones were being dismembered from the body and sold without the consent of the family." This is really disturbing, and made me less likely to donate to science. It may have benefits, but I don't like the risks since there are certain things I definitly don't want my body to go through after death (such as beautifications/plastic surgery)"
To Sarah:
http://sarahfrancesca23.blogspot.com/
"I found your project very interesting and I was curious about what people our age that have not taken the course would think about 'care of the dead.' I found it especially interesting that all interviewees had different answers. The video was also very fun to watch. A line I found most insightful was, "So what separates us from many other teenagers is that we have had a number of moments to really think, to discover and to understand that we have a choice when it comes to our bodies both in life and death." I have to agree with that ending statement because death was a topic I never considered before taking the course. Now, that I have learned the different choices we can make about our bodies, I actually took more time to think things through of what I really wanted. (Though I am also undecisive.) Perhaps knowing that there's so many things to think about make us have to reconsider and second-guess ourselves."
To Rossi:
http://rossi63blog.blogspot.com/
"I found your post really interesting and fun to read. I thought home funerals were 'better' than the traditional funeral procedures, but this interview made me think otherwise. A line that caught my attention was, "The home funeral caused a negative reminder rather that a happy living one." I think I rather be remembered for the good times versus the bad, and though I thought at one point that having a personal home funeral would help people move forward after mourning with their own terms-perhaps this does not apply to everyone. Maybe avoiding reality, avoiding the fact that the person they loved has passed away-is the right decision for some. The interview made me re-think about the home funeral idea. This was a nicely written post."
To Michelle:
http://michelle-normalisweird.blogspot.com/
"This was a very interesting read because its always good to be aware of the different cultures/beliefs around care for the dead. (Instead of focusing solely on the U.S just because we live here.) I found this particularly interesting (about the Teravih), "During which they did not do certain things like wearing new clothes or indulging in sweets or attending any festivities, all done out of respect to the deceased." I never knew this, and I found it really interesting how different certain places deal with death than we do. I feel as though these practices of India culture faces death in a more personal way, and though I do not believe in Hinduism/Buddhism, this post made me think India as a country deals with death in a more healthier way than the U.S does."
To Raven:
http://ravenwnormalisweird.blogspot.com/
"I really enjoyed the video and I found each intereviewee's answers interesting and unique. I think you did a great job with your video and I especially found the idea of our social norm of making a big deal of caring for someone after they have passed away very true. I thought not having consent before using a body for organ donations was disrespectful, but after hearing one of the interviewees I found myself convinced that regardless, people should donate their bodies after death to serve a purpose before decaying to the ground. Overall though, good job!"
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From Ben:
"I think you did a very good job compiling your research. Not only was it a good idea to start by looking back to the previous illness and dying unit (sort of) by viewing the health care report, the fact that you actually took the time to send that e-mail was very impressive to me. One of my favorite lines was, "It’s a bit reassuring though, that there are ways to get around the restrictions of home funerals in the state." I liked this because you acknowledge that although it is not usually a good thing to dodge the law, certain restrictions neither promote the funeral or burial experience. Nice job!"
From Sarah:
"Megumi -
Well done. Your essay was concise, and included some very good information. As someone who is considering a home funeral, this post was significant to me personally. My favorite line was, "The ‘traditional’ way to care for the dead only happened within a few years. It was normal before for families to care for the dead bodies of their loved ones-why is there now a need to hand over the body to strangers? " I wonder though what the norm might shift to next or if the practices we predominantly see throughout society today are here to stay. I hope that in the near future (sometime soon) New York will pass a law making it legal to care for the body without a funeral director. Even though this is possible with the director supervising it seems like there is probably a lot of pressure coming from the director towards the customer. Overall though this was a good post!"
From Mom: (Mentor)
"I thought this was very well written. Though I'm not really for home funerals, I do find it a bit strange that New York requires a funeral director to watch over the process when most states allow it. A line I liked was, "It just does not make sense to me why there’s a whole process to deal with a funeral director. It is as if families are not trusted to care for their loved ones." I don't necessarily agree that that is the reason for the restrictions NYS has for caring the dead, but there are aspects where society puts up a lot of rules/regulations that limits the choices we can make as individuals. Overall, I never knew about home funerals and this was an interesting read."
From Michelle:
"After watching "A Family Undertaker" you mention that became interested in home funerals, so you decided to research more on this and also see if home funerals are restricted in New York State. I valued the topic of this project because it is a topic that was important to you personally being that you currently live in New York and might like to have a home funeral. I also after watching this documentary found home funerals interesting, they seemed more personal than the ones done at funeral homes. Your project mattered to me because now I know that I can choose to have a home funeral here in New York, of course with attendance of a funeral director. Enjoyed reading your post, only thing could have added to make it better would have been comparing it more to regular funerals, but besides that good job"
From Raven:
"I think it's interesting that you chose to focus on the aspect of funeral homes and care of the dead rituals in New York. "A family undertaking" was an informative movie because it helped me to think about different options for the care of the dead rather than the traditional model that is dominant in our society. Good job."
From Kristen:
"I like your essay and all of the research you did to find out more on home funerals in New York. I also found it interesting that New York is the only place were a funeral director is required which I didn’t know. I’m wondering now though why was it so hard for you to find more detailed info on home funerals in New York, why is it kept a secret? Personally I think its something that should be able to be accessed publically."
http://ben11thgradehistoryblog.blogspot.com/
"While reading Stiff, one of the topics that bothered me the most was donating our bodies to science. This post was really interesting and well-written. I was surprised to see that even recently, there are problems as the one you mentioned with the crematorium. "The article also states that over 16,000 lawsuits have been filed over the past 19 years arguing that the body parts of people's loved ones were being dismembered from the body and sold without the consent of the family." This is really disturbing, and made me less likely to donate to science. It may have benefits, but I don't like the risks since there are certain things I definitly don't want my body to go through after death (such as beautifications/plastic surgery)"
To Sarah:
http://sarahfrancesca23.blogspot.com/
"I found your project very interesting and I was curious about what people our age that have not taken the course would think about 'care of the dead.' I found it especially interesting that all interviewees had different answers. The video was also very fun to watch. A line I found most insightful was, "So what separates us from many other teenagers is that we have had a number of moments to really think, to discover and to understand that we have a choice when it comes to our bodies both in life and death." I have to agree with that ending statement because death was a topic I never considered before taking the course. Now, that I have learned the different choices we can make about our bodies, I actually took more time to think things through of what I really wanted. (Though I am also undecisive.) Perhaps knowing that there's so many things to think about make us have to reconsider and second-guess ourselves."
To Rossi:
http://rossi63blog.blogspot.com/
"I found your post really interesting and fun to read. I thought home funerals were 'better' than the traditional funeral procedures, but this interview made me think otherwise. A line that caught my attention was, "The home funeral caused a negative reminder rather that a happy living one." I think I rather be remembered for the good times versus the bad, and though I thought at one point that having a personal home funeral would help people move forward after mourning with their own terms-perhaps this does not apply to everyone. Maybe avoiding reality, avoiding the fact that the person they loved has passed away-is the right decision for some. The interview made me re-think about the home funeral idea. This was a nicely written post."
To Michelle:
http://michelle-normalisweird.blogspot.com/
"This was a very interesting read because its always good to be aware of the different cultures/beliefs around care for the dead. (Instead of focusing solely on the U.S just because we live here.) I found this particularly interesting (about the Teravih), "During which they did not do certain things like wearing new clothes or indulging in sweets or attending any festivities, all done out of respect to the deceased." I never knew this, and I found it really interesting how different certain places deal with death than we do. I feel as though these practices of India culture faces death in a more personal way, and though I do not believe in Hinduism/Buddhism, this post made me think India as a country deals with death in a more healthier way than the U.S does."
To Raven:
http://ravenwnormalisweird.blogspot.com/
"I really enjoyed the video and I found each intereviewee's answers interesting and unique. I think you did a great job with your video and I especially found the idea of our social norm of making a big deal of caring for someone after they have passed away very true. I thought not having consent before using a body for organ donations was disrespectful, but after hearing one of the interviewees I found myself convinced that regardless, people should donate their bodies after death to serve a purpose before decaying to the ground. Overall though, good job!"
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From Ben:
"I think you did a very good job compiling your research. Not only was it a good idea to start by looking back to the previous illness and dying unit (sort of) by viewing the health care report, the fact that you actually took the time to send that e-mail was very impressive to me. One of my favorite lines was, "It’s a bit reassuring though, that there are ways to get around the restrictions of home funerals in the state." I liked this because you acknowledge that although it is not usually a good thing to dodge the law, certain restrictions neither promote the funeral or burial experience. Nice job!"
From Sarah:
"Megumi -
Well done. Your essay was concise, and included some very good information. As someone who is considering a home funeral, this post was significant to me personally. My favorite line was, "The ‘traditional’ way to care for the dead only happened within a few years. It was normal before for families to care for the dead bodies of their loved ones-why is there now a need to hand over the body to strangers? " I wonder though what the norm might shift to next or if the practices we predominantly see throughout society today are here to stay. I hope that in the near future (sometime soon) New York will pass a law making it legal to care for the body without a funeral director. Even though this is possible with the director supervising it seems like there is probably a lot of pressure coming from the director towards the customer. Overall though this was a good post!"
From Mom: (Mentor)
"I thought this was very well written. Though I'm not really for home funerals, I do find it a bit strange that New York requires a funeral director to watch over the process when most states allow it. A line I liked was, "It just does not make sense to me why there’s a whole process to deal with a funeral director. It is as if families are not trusted to care for their loved ones." I don't necessarily agree that that is the reason for the restrictions NYS has for caring the dead, but there are aspects where society puts up a lot of rules/regulations that limits the choices we can make as individuals. Overall, I never knew about home funerals and this was an interesting read."
From Michelle:
"After watching "A Family Undertaker" you mention that became interested in home funerals, so you decided to research more on this and also see if home funerals are restricted in New York State. I valued the topic of this project because it is a topic that was important to you personally being that you currently live in New York and might like to have a home funeral. I also after watching this documentary found home funerals interesting, they seemed more personal than the ones done at funeral homes. Your project mattered to me because now I know that I can choose to have a home funeral here in New York, of course with attendance of a funeral director. Enjoyed reading your post, only thing could have added to make it better would have been comparing it more to regular funerals, but besides that good job"
From Raven:
"I think it's interesting that you chose to focus on the aspect of funeral homes and care of the dead rituals in New York. "A family undertaking" was an informative movie because it helped me to think about different options for the care of the dead rather than the traditional model that is dominant in our society. Good job."
From Kristen:
"I like your essay and all of the research you did to find out more on home funerals in New York. I also found it interesting that New York is the only place were a funeral director is required which I didn’t know. I’m wondering now though why was it so hard for you to find more detailed info on home funerals in New York, why is it kept a secret? Personally I think its something that should be able to be accessed publically."
Monday, May 16, 2011
HW#55: Culminating Project - Care of the Dead
After watching the film, “A Family Undertaking” I became interested in the idea of a home funeral. However, the film mentioned New York as a state that does not allow home funerals. To make sure, I looked it up: “In all, there are only six states that demand a funeral director be involved in the burial process: Connecticut, Indiana, Louisiana, Michigan, Nebraska and New York. Each of these states has laws on the books that require a licensed funeral director be involved in the handling of human remains.” (Green Funerals & Burials-Home Funerals) I found it really ironic that there are laws restricting the deceased to be taken care of by their loved ones who have raised them and brought them up since the day they were born. I decided to look up laws and regulations on home funerals in New York State to see the limitations on what can be done to people after death.
I started by looking at a report on the health care industry which has a small section on New York. Most of the information there only talked about inspections on funerals and facts I found uninteresting. The only relevant information was this, “Requires all funeral homes (also called “funeral firms”) to register with the State, whereas funeral directors are required to hold a license to operate in the state and this license also authorizes them to perform embalming.” (United States General Accounting Office) So does this mean there are cases where home funerals are allowed?
After looking through a few websites, I found something that finally caught my attention: “The Funeral Consumers Alliance of L.I. /NYC has arranged with a local funeral home to offer a Home Funeral plan that complies with New York State law. The options range from simply having the viewing or visitation at home with the funeral director transporting and preparing the body to having the family completely care for the body except for the funeral director obtaining the authorizations required by law and arranging for a funeral director to be present at the final point of disposition.” (Have you considered a Home Funeral?) I decided to look more into this organization’s funeral plans.
I found some hopeful information on their home funeral section. Though New York State does restrict families to care for their own dead close ones, it is not impossible. Their website mentioned that as long as there is a funeral director who signs the death certificate and other necessary forms, and be there at the ‘final point of disposition’ families can still care for the dead body. I e-mailed them to confirm, and received a reply from the co-president of the organization with the following:
"Hi Megumi
New York does allow home funerals, but it is necessary to hire a funeral director for certain purposes. Go to our web site www.NYfunerals.org and download the pamphlet, Home Funerals in New York. I think that it will be helpful to you."
The phamplet on their website mentioned requirements of having a funeral director involved in the process, but it is fine to let families be the ones to care for the body before the body is taken to get buried or cremated.
It was a bit frustrating attempting to research anything further. I wanted to know the restriction in New York State in more detail but most websites mentioned the growing idea of home funerals in general. It seems that there are some ways to do something like a home funeral in the state, but a funeral director just has to be there to either watch over or transport the body. In the states restricting the rights of families to care for the dead of their loved ones, there seems to be this ‘I have to supervise’ attitude according to the Funeral Consumers Alliance. This made me think back on the interview I called for with a funeral director who had negative feelings toward home funerals. The ‘traditional’ way to care for the dead only happened within a few years. It was normal before for families to care for the dead bodies of their loved ones-why is there now a need to hand over the body to strangers? What do they know about the person who died? They are just doing their job, and there’s nothing personal about that.
It’s a bit reassuring though, that there are ways to get around the restrictions of home funerals in the state. It just does not make sense to me why there’s a whole process to deal with a funeral director. It is as if families are not trusted to care for their loved ones. This made me think more about having home funerals. Death isn’t something to look forward to, but just because it upsets us does not mean we should avert our eyes from reality and turn to strangers to carry out the whole process.
Citations:
*"Green Funerals & Burials - Home Funerals." Funeral Wise. FuneralWise, 2010. Web. 16 May 2011.
*"Have you ever Considered a Home Funeral?." nyfunerals.org. Funeral Consumers Alliance of L.I/NYC, 11 Feb 2008. Web. 16 May 2011.
*Hoffman, Elvira. Message to co-President, FCA of L.I./NYC. 16 May 2011. E-mail.
*Nelligan, Jeff. United States. Death Care Regulation Varies across States and by Industry Segment. The General Accounting Office, 2003. Web. 16 May 2011.
*Slocum, Joshua . "Caring For Your Own Dead: Myths and Facts ." Funeral Consumers Alliance. Funeral Consumers Alliance, 30 Jan 2009. Web. 16 May 2011.
I started by looking at a report on the health care industry which has a small section on New York. Most of the information there only talked about inspections on funerals and facts I found uninteresting. The only relevant information was this, “Requires all funeral homes (also called “funeral firms”) to register with the State, whereas funeral directors are required to hold a license to operate in the state and this license also authorizes them to perform embalming.” (United States General Accounting Office) So does this mean there are cases where home funerals are allowed?
After looking through a few websites, I found something that finally caught my attention: “The Funeral Consumers Alliance of L.I. /NYC has arranged with a local funeral home to offer a Home Funeral plan that complies with New York State law. The options range from simply having the viewing or visitation at home with the funeral director transporting and preparing the body to having the family completely care for the body except for the funeral director obtaining the authorizations required by law and arranging for a funeral director to be present at the final point of disposition.” (Have you considered a Home Funeral?) I decided to look more into this organization’s funeral plans.
I found some hopeful information on their home funeral section. Though New York State does restrict families to care for their own dead close ones, it is not impossible. Their website mentioned that as long as there is a funeral director who signs the death certificate and other necessary forms, and be there at the ‘final point of disposition’ families can still care for the dead body. I e-mailed them to confirm, and received a reply from the co-president of the organization with the following:
"Hi Megumi
New York does allow home funerals, but it is necessary to hire a funeral director for certain purposes. Go to our web site www.NYfunerals.org and download the pamphlet, Home Funerals in New York. I think that it will be helpful to you."
The phamplet on their website mentioned requirements of having a funeral director involved in the process, but it is fine to let families be the ones to care for the body before the body is taken to get buried or cremated.
It was a bit frustrating attempting to research anything further. I wanted to know the restriction in New York State in more detail but most websites mentioned the growing idea of home funerals in general. It seems that there are some ways to do something like a home funeral in the state, but a funeral director just has to be there to either watch over or transport the body. In the states restricting the rights of families to care for the dead of their loved ones, there seems to be this ‘I have to supervise’ attitude according to the Funeral Consumers Alliance. This made me think back on the interview I called for with a funeral director who had negative feelings toward home funerals. The ‘traditional’ way to care for the dead only happened within a few years. It was normal before for families to care for the dead bodies of their loved ones-why is there now a need to hand over the body to strangers? What do they know about the person who died? They are just doing their job, and there’s nothing personal about that.
It’s a bit reassuring though, that there are ways to get around the restrictions of home funerals in the state. It just does not make sense to me why there’s a whole process to deal with a funeral director. It is as if families are not trusted to care for their loved ones. This made me think more about having home funerals. Death isn’t something to look forward to, but just because it upsets us does not mean we should avert our eyes from reality and turn to strangers to carry out the whole process.
Citations:
*"Green Funerals & Burials - Home Funerals." Funeral Wise. FuneralWise, 2010. Web. 16 May 2011.
*"Have you ever Considered a Home Funeral?." nyfunerals.org. Funeral Consumers Alliance of L.I/NYC, 11 Feb 2008. Web. 16 May 2011.
*Hoffman, Elvira. Message to co-President, FCA of L.I./NYC. 16 May 2011. E-mail.
*Nelligan, Jeff. United States. Death Care Regulation Varies across States and by Industry Segment. The General Accounting Office, 2003. Web. 16 May 2011.
*Slocum, Joshua . "Caring For Your Own Dead: Myths and Facts ." Funeral Consumers Alliance. Funeral Consumers Alliance, 30 Jan 2009. Web. 16 May 2011.
Tuesday, May 10, 2011
HW#54: Independent Research B
Agnosticism:
Agnosticism is the belief that is neither a deep belief in god nor Atheism. There is weak agnosticism (the belief that we might eventually know if god exists) and strong agnosticism (the belief that we will never know if god exists). There is not enough convincing evidence to support or disprove god's existence, and cannot believe or disbelief in god without clear evidence. Agnosticism is also the belief that without understanding what caused the universe, we cannot understand or know anything about god.
David Hume (1711-1976) was an influential figure whose beliefs lead to the philosophy of Agnosticism. "According to Hume, all sensations are unconnected, and any causal connection we make is in entirely in our minds. These connections are made only after we experience repeated conjunctions of events. Without the ability to understand the cause of the universe, we can never truly know anything about God." (Agnosticism)
Since the idea of Agnosticism is that we cannot truly prove nor disprove the existance of god, there are different opinions about the afterlife or what happens to our 'soul' when we die. There was also a quote that I found interesting from Marcus Aurelius, "Live a good life. If there are gods and they are just, then they will not care how devout you have been, but will welcome you based on the virtues you have lived by. If there are gods, but unjust, then you should not want to worship them. If there are no gods, then you will be gone, but will have lived a noble life that will live on in the memories of your loved ones. I am not afraid." (Quotations. Etymology. History. Beliefs of Agnostics.) This quote shows that having an uncertainty of the exstance (or non-existance) of god will not affect us in a negative way when we die.
I realized how much of a challenge it would be to find someone agnostic that had more knowledge and time thinking about this belief. Instead, I ended up interviewing a college student in her 20's who would like to be kept anonymous. She considers herself an agnostic athiest, meaning she dosn't really believe in god but that does not mean that she is 100% sure that he does not exist. Though she does not believe in an afterlife or heavan, she considers herself agnostic because she feels as if there isn't enough evidence that either supports or not support these claims. When I asked her if it bothered her that she wasn't necessarily completely religous nor athiest, she said it didn't.
Sources:
*"Agnosticism." Philosophy. AllAboutPhilosophy.org, 2011. Web. 10 May 2011.
*Jones, Kyle. "An Agnostic Theology (2010)." the Secular Web. Internet Infidels, 2010. Web. 10 May 2011.
*Robinson, B.A. "Quotations. Etymology.." Religous Tolerance.ORG. Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance, 28 Dec 2009. Web. 10 May 2011.
Agnosticism is the belief that is neither a deep belief in god nor Atheism. There is weak agnosticism (the belief that we might eventually know if god exists) and strong agnosticism (the belief that we will never know if god exists). There is not enough convincing evidence to support or disprove god's existence, and cannot believe or disbelief in god without clear evidence. Agnosticism is also the belief that without understanding what caused the universe, we cannot understand or know anything about god.
David Hume (1711-1976) was an influential figure whose beliefs lead to the philosophy of Agnosticism. "According to Hume, all sensations are unconnected, and any causal connection we make is in entirely in our minds. These connections are made only after we experience repeated conjunctions of events. Without the ability to understand the cause of the universe, we can never truly know anything about God." (Agnosticism)
Since the idea of Agnosticism is that we cannot truly prove nor disprove the existance of god, there are different opinions about the afterlife or what happens to our 'soul' when we die. There was also a quote that I found interesting from Marcus Aurelius, "Live a good life. If there are gods and they are just, then they will not care how devout you have been, but will welcome you based on the virtues you have lived by. If there are gods, but unjust, then you should not want to worship them. If there are no gods, then you will be gone, but will have lived a noble life that will live on in the memories of your loved ones. I am not afraid." (Quotations. Etymology. History. Beliefs of Agnostics.) This quote shows that having an uncertainty of the exstance (or non-existance) of god will not affect us in a negative way when we die.
I realized how much of a challenge it would be to find someone agnostic that had more knowledge and time thinking about this belief. Instead, I ended up interviewing a college student in her 20's who would like to be kept anonymous. She considers herself an agnostic athiest, meaning she dosn't really believe in god but that does not mean that she is 100% sure that he does not exist. Though she does not believe in an afterlife or heavan, she considers herself agnostic because she feels as if there isn't enough evidence that either supports or not support these claims. When I asked her if it bothered her that she wasn't necessarily completely religous nor athiest, she said it didn't.
Sources:
*"Agnosticism." Philosophy. AllAboutPhilosophy.org, 2011. Web. 10 May 2011.
*Jones, Kyle. "An Agnostic Theology (2010)." the Secular Web. Internet Infidels, 2010. Web. 10 May 2011.
*Robinson, B.A. "Quotations. Etymology.." Religous Tolerance.ORG. Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance, 28 Dec 2009. Web. 10 May 2011.
Monday, May 9, 2011
HW#53: Independent Research A
Article One
Stelloh, Tim. "In Her Childhood Dream, a Funeral Home Was the Destination." New York Times (2011): n. pag. Web. 9 May 2011.
Precis:
After seeing her 'peaceful' dead uncle at the age of 7, Ms. Dozier became obsessed with having a career involving dead people. She is a mortician, but the job was not easy. Women usually did not work in the funeral industry during her time and her parents were not happy about her interest in working with dead people. Even today, it is difficult to imagine women to be working in this career.
Article Two
Zezima, Katie. "Home Burials Offer an Intimate Alternative ." New York Times (2009): n. pag. Web. 9 May 2011.
Precis:
Home funerals are a process where everything from caring the dead and building the coffin is done at home. Though home funerals are still uncommon, the numbers have soared in the past 5 years. Home funerals help make the process more personal. Home funerals are also very inexspensive, and maybe families who rather not have home funerals may have to make this decision if they are not financially stable.
Analysis:
Both articles speak from a different stand points. The first article discusses about a mortician who struggled to finally get the career she wanted. She was heavily influenced by her peaceful looking dead uncle and wanted other dead bodies to seem 'peaceful' as well. However, the job of a mortician are also for "traditional" funerals which is something I wish the writer talked more about. The second article focused on multiple stories and positive opinions about home funerals. It was interesting to see that the number of home funerals are increasing in recent years. I think though, that the opinions of both the mortician and the families who were interviewed in the second article had similar attitudes toward the dead: that it is an important process.
Interview:
I called to interview a funeral director for his opinion on home funerals. I was asked what I meant by 'home funerals' and it took a while for him to finally understand what I was talking about. He sounded not only uncomfortable, but spoke as if home funerals aren't realistic. "Families should do it if that's what they really want, but I don't know how they would be able to face a dead family member in their home for a night or two." He kept elaborating on the idea. The argument for home funerals is the idea of getting personal, but a few days meant the person should deal with the death of the person very quickly. He then asked me a bunch of rhetorical questions I just nodded to: What can the family accomplish in such an emotional state? Especially in apartments, how would you call over lots of people over to mourn for the dead? Are the families even in charge of sending the dead to the crematory or burial? "They'll be too emotional to be able to be in charge of the whole process. Don't you think so?" I also asked what he wanted done to his body when he dies, and he said it's up to the survivor's choice since they are the ones dealing with the dead.
Analysis:
After taking down notes from what he said, I realized there were some follow-up questions I had. Though I felt bad about interviwing someone who clearly didn't have a positive view on home funerals, I found his opinion very valuable. How would families be able to face and come to terms with their loved one who has passed away? I found myself nodding when he said a few days is not enough for a person to 'become personal' with the process. How realistic is a home funeral? I thought home funerals were great, but his answers as he spoke in a voice full of discomfort--I realized home funerals aren't for everyone. Death is a difficult event to anyone, and though it is favorable that it be as personal as possible--will families be able to do the whole process themselves?
Stelloh, Tim. "In Her Childhood Dream, a Funeral Home Was the Destination." New York Times (2011): n. pag. Web. 9 May 2011.
Precis:
After seeing her 'peaceful' dead uncle at the age of 7, Ms. Dozier became obsessed with having a career involving dead people. She is a mortician, but the job was not easy. Women usually did not work in the funeral industry during her time and her parents were not happy about her interest in working with dead people. Even today, it is difficult to imagine women to be working in this career.
Article Two
Zezima, Katie. "Home Burials Offer an Intimate Alternative ." New York Times (2009): n. pag. Web. 9 May 2011.
Precis:
Home funerals are a process where everything from caring the dead and building the coffin is done at home. Though home funerals are still uncommon, the numbers have soared in the past 5 years. Home funerals help make the process more personal. Home funerals are also very inexspensive, and maybe families who rather not have home funerals may have to make this decision if they are not financially stable.
Analysis:
Both articles speak from a different stand points. The first article discusses about a mortician who struggled to finally get the career she wanted. She was heavily influenced by her peaceful looking dead uncle and wanted other dead bodies to seem 'peaceful' as well. However, the job of a mortician are also for "traditional" funerals which is something I wish the writer talked more about. The second article focused on multiple stories and positive opinions about home funerals. It was interesting to see that the number of home funerals are increasing in recent years. I think though, that the opinions of both the mortician and the families who were interviewed in the second article had similar attitudes toward the dead: that it is an important process.
Interview:
I called to interview a funeral director for his opinion on home funerals. I was asked what I meant by 'home funerals' and it took a while for him to finally understand what I was talking about. He sounded not only uncomfortable, but spoke as if home funerals aren't realistic. "Families should do it if that's what they really want, but I don't know how they would be able to face a dead family member in their home for a night or two." He kept elaborating on the idea. The argument for home funerals is the idea of getting personal, but a few days meant the person should deal with the death of the person very quickly. He then asked me a bunch of rhetorical questions I just nodded to: What can the family accomplish in such an emotional state? Especially in apartments, how would you call over lots of people over to mourn for the dead? Are the families even in charge of sending the dead to the crematory or burial? "They'll be too emotional to be able to be in charge of the whole process. Don't you think so?" I also asked what he wanted done to his body when he dies, and he said it's up to the survivor's choice since they are the ones dealing with the dead.
Analysis:
After taking down notes from what he said, I realized there were some follow-up questions I had. Though I felt bad about interviwing someone who clearly didn't have a positive view on home funerals, I found his opinion very valuable. How would families be able to face and come to terms with their loved one who has passed away? I found myself nodding when he said a few days is not enough for a person to 'become personal' with the process. How realistic is a home funeral? I thought home funerals were great, but his answers as he spoke in a voice full of discomfort--I realized home funerals aren't for everyone. Death is a difficult event to anyone, and though it is favorable that it be as personal as possible--will families be able to do the whole process themselves?
Saturday, May 7, 2011
HW#52: Third Third of the COTD Book
Precis:
Though a cut-off head cannot speak without lungs, the personality might exist within the brain. Perhaps head transplants to bodies may work, but it's unlikely it will happen. In many parts of the world, cannibalism did exist before. Parts of the human body were used as medicine and cures. Familes of the dead should not do things that will make them uncomfortable-the final decision should be made from the living.
Favorite Quotes:
"But it could be done. And if the man seemed more or less the same individual he was before you cut his head, perhaps a little less calm, then you would know that indeed the self is there in the brain." (199)
"The humanitarian benefits of its donation outweigh the emotional discomfor surrounding its removal-for most of us, anyway. Body transplants are another story. Will people or their families ever give an entire, intact body away to improve the health of a stranger?" (217)
"Bile didn't cure deafness per se, but if your hearing problem was caused by a buildup of wax, the acidy substance probably worked to dissolve it. Human toenail isn't a true emetic, but one can imagine that an oral dose might encourage vomiting..." (227)
"People who make elaborate requests concerning dispostiton of their bodies are probably people who have trouble with the concept of not exsting." (290)
"I've had kids object to their dad's wishes [to donate]," says Ronn Wade..."I tell them, 'Do what's best for you. You're the one who has to live with it."' (291)
Analysis:
Regardless of if human cadavers can actually be beneficial to our health, I still see cannibalism as an ethically wrong. I will always find cannibalism disgusting, though the chapter made me more likely to not critisize those who think its okay to eat human cadavers. I found the chapter about full body transplants interesting. I don't think head/body transplants will happen any time soon. I would have agreed with the idea when, "the operation is so exspensive and would only benefit a small number of patients." (215) I feel uncomfortable with the idea though I don't want to be-isn't it the same idea as an organ donation surgery? Towards the end of the book, the topic about deciding over our dead bodies was brought up. I have to admit-I might be one of those people who dosn't like the idea of not existing. But, I wouldn't make my will too elaborate. My decision for now is the same as the author's: let my family or the people who have to live my death make decisions if what I want makes them uncomfortable--as long as I become a organ donor if I become brain dead. This idea connects back to the illness and dying unit- why are we afraid of death? We don't know what will happen when we die and we're afraid of becoming non-existent.
Though a cut-off head cannot speak without lungs, the personality might exist within the brain. Perhaps head transplants to bodies may work, but it's unlikely it will happen. In many parts of the world, cannibalism did exist before. Parts of the human body were used as medicine and cures. Familes of the dead should not do things that will make them uncomfortable-the final decision should be made from the living.
Favorite Quotes:
"But it could be done. And if the man seemed more or less the same individual he was before you cut his head, perhaps a little less calm, then you would know that indeed the self is there in the brain." (199)
"The humanitarian benefits of its donation outweigh the emotional discomfor surrounding its removal-for most of us, anyway. Body transplants are another story. Will people or their families ever give an entire, intact body away to improve the health of a stranger?" (217)
"Bile didn't cure deafness per se, but if your hearing problem was caused by a buildup of wax, the acidy substance probably worked to dissolve it. Human toenail isn't a true emetic, but one can imagine that an oral dose might encourage vomiting..." (227)
"People who make elaborate requests concerning dispostiton of their bodies are probably people who have trouble with the concept of not exsting." (290)
"I've had kids object to their dad's wishes [to donate]," says Ronn Wade..."I tell them, 'Do what's best for you. You're the one who has to live with it."' (291)
Analysis:
Regardless of if human cadavers can actually be beneficial to our health, I still see cannibalism as an ethically wrong. I will always find cannibalism disgusting, though the chapter made me more likely to not critisize those who think its okay to eat human cadavers. I found the chapter about full body transplants interesting. I don't think head/body transplants will happen any time soon. I would have agreed with the idea when, "the operation is so exspensive and would only benefit a small number of patients." (215) I feel uncomfortable with the idea though I don't want to be-isn't it the same idea as an organ donation surgery? Towards the end of the book, the topic about deciding over our dead bodies was brought up. I have to admit-I might be one of those people who dosn't like the idea of not existing. But, I wouldn't make my will too elaborate. My decision for now is the same as the author's: let my family or the people who have to live my death make decisions if what I want makes them uncomfortable--as long as I become a organ donor if I become brain dead. This idea connects back to the illness and dying unit- why are we afraid of death? We don't know what will happen when we die and we're afraid of becoming non-existent.
Tuesday, May 3, 2011
HW#51: Second Third of COTD Book
Precis:
Cadavers are very helpful. Cadavers can help draw conclusions about how much damage humans can take before it becomes fatal. Cadavers can also help give clues about how a plane crash happened. However, there are also animals that are tested when cadavers are not enough to find out the effects of certain accidents. I would let my dead body go through these tests; don’t want my body to be used religious testing. The most helpful cadavers are those who are brain dead and go through surgery to save peoples’ lives.
Favorite Quotes:
“The sort of things most of us can’t imagine seeing or coping with-severed hands, legs, scraps of flesh-Shanahan is more comfortable with. “That way, it’s just tissue. You can put yourself in that frame of mind and get on with your job.” It’s gory, but not sad.” (116)
“In the case of the U.S. and European research, the theory doesn’t hold. Pigs don’t get shot at because our culture reviles them as filthy and disgusting. Pigs get shot at because their organs are a lot like ours...” (135)
“Does that mean I would let someone blow up my dead foot to help save the feet of NATO landmine clearers? It does. And would I let someone shoot my dead face with a nonlethal projectile to help prevent accidental fatalities? I suppose I would.” (153)
“Everyone wanted to go up and see what it felt like.” Granted, Zugibe was using leather straps, not nails. (Over the years, Zugibe has occasionally received calls from volunteers seeking the real deal. “Would you believe? A girl called me and wanted me to actually nail her...”) (162)
“She bleeds where she is cut and her organs are plump and slippery-looking. The electronic beat of the heart monitor reinforces the impression that this is a living, breathing, thriving person. It is strange, almost impossible, really, to think of her as a corpse.” (169)
“We abide the surgeon’s scalpel to save our own lives, our loved ones’ lives, but not to save a stranger’s life. H has no heart, but heartless is the last thing you’d call her. (195)
Analysis:
This 2/3 of the book made me really upset. The author seems to be okay with having his dead body tested and experimented with, but I wouldn't want that when I die. I tried to think about how these tests would create solutions so future accidents can be prevented-but I still do not want my body to go through so much gore and just be seen as tissue. The chapter that struck me most was the last one I read-about being an organ donor when brain dead. If I become brain-dead I had always wanted to be an organ donor and the chapter furthured this wish. If my dead body can save lives of others, that would be amazing. It would be a waste to just be cremated or buried without donating what is healthy to those who need it.
Cadavers are very helpful. Cadavers can help draw conclusions about how much damage humans can take before it becomes fatal. Cadavers can also help give clues about how a plane crash happened. However, there are also animals that are tested when cadavers are not enough to find out the effects of certain accidents. I would let my dead body go through these tests; don’t want my body to be used religious testing. The most helpful cadavers are those who are brain dead and go through surgery to save peoples’ lives.
Favorite Quotes:
“The sort of things most of us can’t imagine seeing or coping with-severed hands, legs, scraps of flesh-Shanahan is more comfortable with. “That way, it’s just tissue. You can put yourself in that frame of mind and get on with your job.” It’s gory, but not sad.” (116)
“In the case of the U.S. and European research, the theory doesn’t hold. Pigs don’t get shot at because our culture reviles them as filthy and disgusting. Pigs get shot at because their organs are a lot like ours...” (135)
“Does that mean I would let someone blow up my dead foot to help save the feet of NATO landmine clearers? It does. And would I let someone shoot my dead face with a nonlethal projectile to help prevent accidental fatalities? I suppose I would.” (153)
“Everyone wanted to go up and see what it felt like.” Granted, Zugibe was using leather straps, not nails. (Over the years, Zugibe has occasionally received calls from volunteers seeking the real deal. “Would you believe? A girl called me and wanted me to actually nail her...”) (162)
“She bleeds where she is cut and her organs are plump and slippery-looking. The electronic beat of the heart monitor reinforces the impression that this is a living, breathing, thriving person. It is strange, almost impossible, really, to think of her as a corpse.” (169)
“We abide the surgeon’s scalpel to save our own lives, our loved ones’ lives, but not to save a stranger’s life. H has no heart, but heartless is the last thing you’d call her. (195)
Analysis:
This 2/3 of the book made me really upset. The author seems to be okay with having his dead body tested and experimented with, but I wouldn't want that when I die. I tried to think about how these tests would create solutions so future accidents can be prevented-but I still do not want my body to go through so much gore and just be seen as tissue. The chapter that struck me most was the last one I read-about being an organ donor when brain dead. If I become brain-dead I had always wanted to be an organ donor and the chapter furthured this wish. If my dead body can save lives of others, that would be amazing. It would be a waste to just be cremated or buried without donating what is healthy to those who need it.
Saturday, April 30, 2011
HW #49: Comments on Best of Your Break HW
To Raven:
"I found these perspectives on caring for the dead were very interesting and thought-provacative. I also thought you did a good job analyzing these interviewees. One line I found insightful was, "...if people understood the promise of heaven and if they knew it was a place they would be going they would no longer be afraid about death." Though I don't have a clear opinon/belief around afterdeath and heaven I think this is one of the reasons why I fear death. If I had a certainty that nothing negative will happen when I die, than my fear wouldn't be that serious."
To Ben:
"I found your post very interesting and got me thinking. I did not think the first thing your interviewees thought of when hearing the word 'death' was those that are close to them. I found this particularly interesting because I remember one of my close relatives had told me before that she worries more about my my life than her death-which was a shock to me at the moment but after reading your post I think it makes more sense."
---------------------------------------------------------------
Comments on my Hw#47:
From Mom:
"I found your post a very interesting read. Even for me, I don't know exactly how I want my body to be treated after death so it makes sense that teenagers and young adults are indecisive about these choices. I found this line insightful, "After interviewing a few people, I realized myself agreeing (or at least understanding) with most of the answers I received. Maybe its because we were close in age, and that affects our perceptions and ideas on death and our bodies." I agree that age does have an affect on how we perceive death or how much we think about it."
From Ben:
"I really enjoyed reading this post, particularly because you were able to find three relatively different opinions, and your post also introduced a factor of caring for the dead that I had never really thought about before, which is cost. Now that I think about it, the casket's in which most people are buried are probably pretty expensive, which just adds to my list of reasons why I am thinking of choosing cremation over burial as well. Overall, this post did a good job of getting me thinking. One question- Have you ever confronted someone who has experienced or thought about other ways of caring for the dead besides cremation and burial?"
From Raven:
"Your post was very interesting because I also agree that a social norm in our society is that funerals should be depressing but if everyone is going to die one day death should not be something we mourn. I have not decided how I want to die because it's difficult to decide if I would like to be cremated or donate my organs but hopefully by the end of this unit I will decide. A question I have for you is: Do you think religion is the only determining factor for the way we want to die?"
"I found these perspectives on caring for the dead were very interesting and thought-provacative. I also thought you did a good job analyzing these interviewees. One line I found insightful was, "...if people understood the promise of heaven and if they knew it was a place they would be going they would no longer be afraid about death." Though I don't have a clear opinon/belief around afterdeath and heaven I think this is one of the reasons why I fear death. If I had a certainty that nothing negative will happen when I die, than my fear wouldn't be that serious."
To Ben:
"I found your post very interesting and got me thinking. I did not think the first thing your interviewees thought of when hearing the word 'death' was those that are close to them. I found this particularly interesting because I remember one of my close relatives had told me before that she worries more about my my life than her death-which was a shock to me at the moment but after reading your post I think it makes more sense."
---------------------------------------------------------------
Comments on my Hw#47:
From Mom:
"I found your post a very interesting read. Even for me, I don't know exactly how I want my body to be treated after death so it makes sense that teenagers and young adults are indecisive about these choices. I found this line insightful, "After interviewing a few people, I realized myself agreeing (or at least understanding) with most of the answers I received. Maybe its because we were close in age, and that affects our perceptions and ideas on death and our bodies." I agree that age does have an affect on how we perceive death or how much we think about it."
From Ben:
"I really enjoyed reading this post, particularly because you were able to find three relatively different opinions, and your post also introduced a factor of caring for the dead that I had never really thought about before, which is cost. Now that I think about it, the casket's in which most people are buried are probably pretty expensive, which just adds to my list of reasons why I am thinking of choosing cremation over burial as well. Overall, this post did a good job of getting me thinking. One question- Have you ever confronted someone who has experienced or thought about other ways of caring for the dead besides cremation and burial?"
From Raven:
"Your post was very interesting because I also agree that a social norm in our society is that funerals should be depressing but if everyone is going to die one day death should not be something we mourn. I have not decided how I want to die because it's difficult to decide if I would like to be cremated or donate my organs but hopefully by the end of this unit I will decide. A question I have for you is: Do you think religion is the only determining factor for the way we want to die?"
Friday, April 29, 2011
HW# 50: First Third of Care-of-the-Dead Book Post
Stiff: The Curious Lives of Human Cadavers By: Mary Roach
Precis:
The treatment of cadavers have changed over time. Today, we are brought up to have respect for the dead, but back in the day there were cases where people dug up fresh cadavers for money. It was commonplace. Donating parts of our bodies was also unthinkable before. The first third of the book covers historical stories surrounding cadavers and different ways cadavers of today are treated.
Quotes:
"For most physicians, objectification is mastered their first year of medical school, in the gross anatomy lab, or "gross lab," as it is casually and somewhat aptly known." (Page 21)
"It's the reason most of us prefer a pork chop to a slice of whole suckling pig. It's the reason we say "pork" and "beef" instead of "pig" and "cow." Dissection and surgical instruction, like meat-eating, require a carefully maintained set of illusions and denial." (21)
"Cosmetic surgery exists, for better or for worse, and it's important, for the sake of those who udnergo it, that the surgeons who do it are able to do it well. Though perhaps there ought to be a box for people to check, or not check on their body donor form: Okay to use for Cosmetic purposes." (24)
"Back then no one donated his body to science. The churchgoing masses believed in a literal, corporal rising from the grave, and dissection was thought of as pretty much spoiling your chances of resurrection: Who's going to open the gates of heaven to some slob with his entrails hanging out and dripping on the carpeting?" (40)
"The far more common tactic was to sneak into a graveyard and dig up someone else's relative to study." (43)
"Mack is telling ne about a ninety-seven-year-old woman who looked sixty after her embalming. "We had to paint in wrinkiles, or the family wouldn't recognize her." (80)
Analytical Paragraph:
The first third of the book covers multiple topics about dealing with cadavers. The first topic discussed (which I did not expect to read about) were about face lifting and plastic surgery on cadavers. This was upsetting to me because I assumed being a 'body donor' meant donating parts of the cadaver to save lives, not to look better. I find that wrong. For the rest of the third of the book, the author describes about the history of cadavers, which I found shocking and disturbing. Multiple stories are introduced, showing how people were driven to dissect and dig up dead bodies from obsessive or greedy emotions. I left off reading about what really happens to our bodies when 'nature takes its course'-I knew that the human body would rot but I still felt uncomfortable about the idea. This connected to the next topic discussed-the process of ambalming. I was actually curious about how effective they were. Embalming is definitly a process showing how much as human beings we become in denial that death is not a pretty site no matter what decisions we make.
Precis:
The treatment of cadavers have changed over time. Today, we are brought up to have respect for the dead, but back in the day there were cases where people dug up fresh cadavers for money. It was commonplace. Donating parts of our bodies was also unthinkable before. The first third of the book covers historical stories surrounding cadavers and different ways cadavers of today are treated.
Quotes:
"For most physicians, objectification is mastered their first year of medical school, in the gross anatomy lab, or "gross lab," as it is casually and somewhat aptly known." (Page 21)
"It's the reason most of us prefer a pork chop to a slice of whole suckling pig. It's the reason we say "pork" and "beef" instead of "pig" and "cow." Dissection and surgical instruction, like meat-eating, require a carefully maintained set of illusions and denial." (21)
"Cosmetic surgery exists, for better or for worse, and it's important, for the sake of those who udnergo it, that the surgeons who do it are able to do it well. Though perhaps there ought to be a box for people to check, or not check on their body donor form: Okay to use for Cosmetic purposes." (24)
"Back then no one donated his body to science. The churchgoing masses believed in a literal, corporal rising from the grave, and dissection was thought of as pretty much spoiling your chances of resurrection: Who's going to open the gates of heaven to some slob with his entrails hanging out and dripping on the carpeting?" (40)
"The far more common tactic was to sneak into a graveyard and dig up someone else's relative to study." (43)
"Mack is telling ne about a ninety-seven-year-old woman who looked sixty after her embalming. "We had to paint in wrinkiles, or the family wouldn't recognize her." (80)
Analytical Paragraph:
The first third of the book covers multiple topics about dealing with cadavers. The first topic discussed (which I did not expect to read about) were about face lifting and plastic surgery on cadavers. This was upsetting to me because I assumed being a 'body donor' meant donating parts of the cadaver to save lives, not to look better. I find that wrong. For the rest of the third of the book, the author describes about the history of cadavers, which I found shocking and disturbing. Multiple stories are introduced, showing how people were driven to dissect and dig up dead bodies from obsessive or greedy emotions. I left off reading about what really happens to our bodies when 'nature takes its course'-I knew that the human body would rot but I still felt uncomfortable about the idea. This connected to the next topic discussed-the process of ambalming. I was actually curious about how effective they were. Embalming is definitly a process showing how much as human beings we become in denial that death is not a pretty site no matter what decisions we make.
Sunday, April 24, 2011
HW#48: Family Perspectives on the Care of the Dead
One of my family member told me I can make the final decision about what happens to her when she passes away. She prefers to be cremated over a casket though because of how creepy her body will become physically as it rots underground. I can also carry her cremated bones in a jar until I can decide where to place it. The only close one she had lost was her grandparents who have passed away when she was very young. She says those deaths havn't affected her though. She is not religious but her grandparents are buddhists. She rather have me pray to her instead of having a buddhist monk over though-she dosn't see the point in that. When I asked her what she thinks happens after death, she simply answered "I don't know. Nobody knows until we die." When I said that some people have a clear idea of what happens after death, she told me that "Some people are brainwashed as a child to believe in a certain religion. But, I havn't been raised that way, so I have no idea."
The other family member wants to be buried in Japan. He also mentioned about having some sort of celebration on every anniversary of his death. He dosn't want his death to be grieved or have people be depressed over his funeral. Losing his own father made him want to spend his time with the people in his life and make it more valuable. He dosn't have a strong belief or religion, and though he is not clear on what he thinks happens after death he wants to still be remembered after death.
The two family members had similar uncertainties of what happens after death. This was something I found in my own opinion and my peers perspectives. We can never know for sure, and I think the people who do seem to have a clear idea of what happens-they are influenced deeply by religion. Another similarity would be the avoidance of causing grief over celebration. Death is not what people want, but society makes it seem as if we have to be depressed and mourn for the dead-it dosn't have to be this way. Most of the people I interviewed in general leaned towards cremation over caskets. I think religion has some affect on thsi decision. Those who aren't too religous prefer cremation and those who are in more favor of caskets have a religous belief-but this is an over generalization. It's something I'm curious about though.
The other family member wants to be buried in Japan. He also mentioned about having some sort of celebration on every anniversary of his death. He dosn't want his death to be grieved or have people be depressed over his funeral. Losing his own father made him want to spend his time with the people in his life and make it more valuable. He dosn't have a strong belief or religion, and though he is not clear on what he thinks happens after death he wants to still be remembered after death.
The two family members had similar uncertainties of what happens after death. This was something I found in my own opinion and my peers perspectives. We can never know for sure, and I think the people who do seem to have a clear idea of what happens-they are influenced deeply by religion. Another similarity would be the avoidance of causing grief over celebration. Death is not what people want, but society makes it seem as if we have to be depressed and mourn for the dead-it dosn't have to be this way. Most of the people I interviewed in general leaned towards cremation over caskets. I think religion has some affect on thsi decision. Those who aren't too religous prefer cremation and those who are in more favor of caskets have a religous belief-but this is an over generalization. It's something I'm curious about though.
Tuesday, April 19, 2011
HW#47: Peer Perspectives on the Care of the Dead
After interviewing a few people, I realized myself agreeing (or at least understanding) with most of the answers I received. Maybe its because we were close in age, and that affects our perceptions and ideas on death and our bodies. The first person I interviewed wanted a party for her funeral, so its not depressing. She was still indecisive about how she wanted her body to be physically taken care of. Her experiences close people passing away has made her less afraid of death and made her cherish every moment with those she loves. Though she is not heavily religious, she has mentioned the obvious social norm of a funeral if the body is not cremated.
The second interviewee was very clear on what he wanted. He wanted to be cremated and showed that he wants to avoid anything exspensive. He also mentioned it would save more space. The only death he has experienced of was of his great grandmother which was when he was really young, so he said that he is not really affected by it. It's something he should think about though, because his other relatives are getting very old as well. When I asked him what he thought would happen after death, he said nothing. And, even if something did happen we'll never know until we die and our main concerns should be about life.
The third interviewee was actually pretty simple. She just mentioned that she would like a funeral when she dies. She dosn't really think about death or how she wants her body to be taken care of. She dosn't know what will happen when we're dead, but when we do 'there will be answers to everything.' She is not heavily affected by death and she is not afraid of death if it is by age. She only fears death if it was something unpredictable, like an accident.
I noticed that at this age, its hard to make a decision about how our bodies should be dealt at death-its not something we would think of so early in our lives. Funerals were a common answer to how our bodies should be taken care of, but that was predictable. I noticed the two choices of being buried or being cremated and that's a deicison thats hard to pick. I found it interesting that one of my interviewee's was sure that he wanted to be cremated. His ideas goes hand in hand with mines because I agree. Though a burial seems more fancy, I don't want people spending so much money after I die. I agree with the social norm of having a funeral but instead it really should be less depressing than it has to.
The second interviewee was very clear on what he wanted. He wanted to be cremated and showed that he wants to avoid anything exspensive. He also mentioned it would save more space. The only death he has experienced of was of his great grandmother which was when he was really young, so he said that he is not really affected by it. It's something he should think about though, because his other relatives are getting very old as well. When I asked him what he thought would happen after death, he said nothing. And, even if something did happen we'll never know until we die and our main concerns should be about life.
The third interviewee was actually pretty simple. She just mentioned that she would like a funeral when she dies. She dosn't really think about death or how she wants her body to be taken care of. She dosn't know what will happen when we're dead, but when we do 'there will be answers to everything.' She is not heavily affected by death and she is not afraid of death if it is by age. She only fears death if it was something unpredictable, like an accident.
I noticed that at this age, its hard to make a decision about how our bodies should be dealt at death-its not something we would think of so early in our lives. Funerals were a common answer to how our bodies should be taken care of, but that was predictable. I noticed the two choices of being buried or being cremated and that's a deicison thats hard to pick. I found it interesting that one of my interviewee's was sure that he wanted to be cremated. His ideas goes hand in hand with mines because I agree. Though a burial seems more fancy, I don't want people spending so much money after I die. I agree with the social norm of having a funeral but instead it really should be less depressing than it has to.
Saturday, April 16, 2011
HW#46: Initial Thoughts on the Care of the Dead
To be honest, I don't have a lot of knowledge about how to care for the dead. I remember when my grandfather passed away and I had to take a plane to Japan as soon as I heard the news. I didn't like being at his funeral. I loved my grandfather (and still do) but the event made things uncomfortable. Why do people wear black at funerals? Do funerals have to be this depressing? I honestly also felt bored and sleepy as a buddhist priest kept speaking in a confusing language. It didn't hit me that my grandfather actually passed away until I saw him in an open casket. At the funeral, some people became emotional while others talked about my grandfather. I thought at that time that I should cry-but now I think that I was very confused. The first time I actually became upset about his death was when I came to visit my grandparents the summer after and he wasn't there.
I think there's an unspoken rule in my family (and most likely in other families as well) that you're not allowed to say anything bad about the person who has passed away. That you're supposed to respect and remourse for the dead. And, I agree. Even if someone close in my life that I don't really get along with passes away, I would be upset. Maybe its just another social norm to respect the dead. Death means that the person won't be there anymore physically and even the people who I don't really like has an affect on my life. Life feels weird if suddenly one person dissapears like that. Maybe this just means that people have this assumption that people don't just die. I knew my grandfather was old, but his death was unexpected regardless. Or maybe people just avoid the thought of a close one dying.
Questions:
1. How does the U.S 'care for the dead?'
2. What are the different opinions surrounding caskets and cremation?
3. How does religion play a role on caring for the dead?
I think there's an unspoken rule in my family (and most likely in other families as well) that you're not allowed to say anything bad about the person who has passed away. That you're supposed to respect and remourse for the dead. And, I agree. Even if someone close in my life that I don't really get along with passes away, I would be upset. Maybe its just another social norm to respect the dead. Death means that the person won't be there anymore physically and even the people who I don't really like has an affect on my life. Life feels weird if suddenly one person dissapears like that. Maybe this just means that people have this assumption that people don't just die. I knew my grandfather was old, but his death was unexpected regardless. Or maybe people just avoid the thought of a close one dying.
Questions:
1. How does the U.S 'care for the dead?'
2. What are the different opinions surrounding caskets and cremation?
3. How does religion play a role on caring for the dead?
Wednesday, April 13, 2011
HW#45: Reply to Other People's Comments
Most of the comments I received had similar reasons to what they especially enjoyed about the project. I was appreciated for the use of great statistics, while also mixing these statistics with my own opinions to make it nice to read. I'm glad that the research I done and wrote about wasn't too dull and dense to read.
Sarah had commented that I carried a "calm yet firm tone" in my post which I found interesting. I wasn't thinking too much about tone while I wrote down the statistics, but I do think that we should keep calm when presenting sensitive topics such as birth and pregnancy. It's alarming that C-sections are increasing, but I wouldn't put down mothers who give birth in hospitals even after learning about the risks-I just think its just better to be aware and less ignorant about these things.
I thought my younger mentor Angela, made an interesting point. After reading my post, she realized how the media is promoting birth in hospitals as well--affecting her assumpion that hospital birth is the best choice. The statistics helped her see the truth though-that hospitals have their own risks as well. What society and the media tells us isn't always the truth, and sometimes the only way to figure the facts is to look up the numbers.
I realized that both Sarah and Leticia mentioned about being a C-section baby. Before learning about this unit, I also have believed that it was 'normal' and 'safe' to have a Cesarean-that it only happens in case of an emergency. I find this a bit scary, because our society is full of social norms and most people just accept is as a truth without quesioning it. I also know parents that had C-sections, which made me question if that was really necessary.
Sarah had commented that I carried a "calm yet firm tone" in my post which I found interesting. I wasn't thinking too much about tone while I wrote down the statistics, but I do think that we should keep calm when presenting sensitive topics such as birth and pregnancy. It's alarming that C-sections are increasing, but I wouldn't put down mothers who give birth in hospitals even after learning about the risks-I just think its just better to be aware and less ignorant about these things.
I thought my younger mentor Angela, made an interesting point. After reading my post, she realized how the media is promoting birth in hospitals as well--affecting her assumpion that hospital birth is the best choice. The statistics helped her see the truth though-that hospitals have their own risks as well. What society and the media tells us isn't always the truth, and sometimes the only way to figure the facts is to look up the numbers.
I realized that both Sarah and Leticia mentioned about being a C-section baby. Before learning about this unit, I also have believed that it was 'normal' and 'safe' to have a Cesarean-that it only happens in case of an emergency. I find this a bit scary, because our society is full of social norms and most people just accept is as a truth without quesioning it. I also know parents that had C-sections, which made me question if that was really necessary.
Monday, April 11, 2011
HW#44: Comments on Other People's Projects
To Raven: (from thinking/writing team)
"ACOG seemed to be on the women's side but in fact they support more for doctor's benefits. Because of ACOG, C-section rates have risen, unsafe drugs are used on mothers, and doctors are unable to speak up for fear of litigation.
I like your use of statistics to back-up your claims that ACOG is not really for the benefit of women. I also found your post clear and to the point and was an interesting read.
This matters to me because ACOG controls the decisions doctors make. The doctor's role should be to give fair choices to patients and not making irrational decisions because they don't want to get in trouble. It's important to know who's behind these problems in hospitals."
To Ben: (from thinking/writing team)
"Your project goes on to compare and contrast the benefits and downsides to both home births and hospital birth.
I really liked how you organized this post and was easy and interesting to read. I especially enjoyed reading about your mother's friend who experienced both, and showing how her response contrasted with your mother's opinion on home birth.
This matters to me because its difficult to make decisions about where to give birth when both sides have their own arguments. Your post clearly summarized the important aspects of the unit in addition to interviewing people."
To Steph:
"For this project, you focused on adoption and specifically if they accepted homosexual adoption.
I really enjoyed your speech and post because adoption was a topic that was barely covered. I liked that you actually took the initiative to call these agencies to see their opinions on homosexuality.
This project matters to me because I lack knowledge on adoption and the issue of homosexuality. This project made me question Leak and Watts and why you had too e-mail a director just for an answer if they accepted homosexual adoption. I found this project very interesting and brave to do."
To Sarah:
"Your post focuses on the history of birth and how things have drastically changed just within 100 years. Over time, birth has moved from home to hospital.
I really liked how organized and clear your post is, and your use of specific research to show the huge change in the history of birth. I especially enjoyed reading the story of the mother who gave birth in Central Africa and America and found it suprising how different it was.
This project matter to me because I have to agree that history helps us understand a topic a lot better. Reading this project has helped me give a better sense of how the history of birth has lead to this situation where most women in the U.S give birth in hospitals."
To Rossi:
"For this project, you had the experience of being able to interview three women at a hospital about their opinion on midwifery, obsterics, and the rise in c-section.
I really enjoyed reading this post in addition to listening to your elevator speech. The three women you interviewed had different reactions and opinions which was very interesting.
This matters to me because its always nice to listen to the opinion of the people who actually work in hospitals. I found it suprising that one of the interviewed women was open about her opinions about midwifery, and I find a relief in a way."
------------------------------------------------------------------
From David:
"Megumi,
You examined the importance of c-sections, and the reason why it is chosen by women over natural birth even though it isn't a very good way to give birth. This was also an interesting topic that I looked into myself.
One aspect that I particularly valued was that you had well explained statistics on c-section rates in the United States.
A reason why your subject mattered to me was because I also looked into C-section rates in the United States as well as China because these rates were increasing even though C-sections have many harms.-David."
From Mom:
"I love your use of statistics and clear sources to support your claims surrounding the dangers of C-sections in the U.S. It's important to be aware and well informed about what the research says moreso than assuming what is safe just because society says so. I found this topic and post very interesting."
From Sarah:
"Megumi,
You focused on c-sections in the United States, specifically how they have dominated the nations birthing process.
One aspect that I appreciated was how although you were revealing information that is not so great, you carried a very calm yet firm tone throughout your blog post. I found it interesting that you wove your own ideas into your piece while still incorporating the general statistics.
Your project matters to me because I was a c-section baby, and the more I hear about the procedure the more I question how I was brought into this world. While I also know at this point that some day I would like to have children and it is good to be informed of this information before you even have to think about a decision.
The only thing I would suggest working on is a better tie between each of your paragraphs. Although each paragraph was strong on it's own, there seemed to lack a strong connection between all of your points. However, I was very impressed with your blog post, keep up the good work!"
From Angela: (Younger mentor)
""Birth should not be treated as an illness where the most common solution is a cesarean section. Homebirths and midwives seem inviting, but it’s difficult to make an alternative decision when we're faced with the sad assumption that hospitals are the best way to go for giving birth. Is home birth really safer than hospital birth? "
I thought as well that it was safer to give birth in a hospital rather than home birth. Things such as movies and everyday society promotes birth at a hospital. The statistics gave this a even bigger meaning to the post itself and gave me a better idea on how it really is. I wish there was more recent data to see if this remains true, and your ideas as well made this post stand out as well."
From Jay:
"Your fact backed, curiosity fueled look at cesarean sections was a nice read and without a doubt the most informative post I've read thus far. While we went into depth in this topic in class, you managed to compile the valuable facts and necessary information into one informative concise essay, very important in terms of educating the ignorant."
From Leticia:
"Hi megumi,
This is leticia.
I liked how you focused on c- sections in the United States, and it became high practice in the birthing process.
While reading your blog I liked how you explained the statistics on C-section rates in the United States. And how you explained the statistics but you added your ideas, which made the blog more interesting.
This matters to me because, From reading your blog and doing some research on my mine. This makes me think about was it because they mother needed or was it because the doctors just wanted to do?"
"ACOG seemed to be on the women's side but in fact they support more for doctor's benefits. Because of ACOG, C-section rates have risen, unsafe drugs are used on mothers, and doctors are unable to speak up for fear of litigation.
I like your use of statistics to back-up your claims that ACOG is not really for the benefit of women. I also found your post clear and to the point and was an interesting read.
This matters to me because ACOG controls the decisions doctors make. The doctor's role should be to give fair choices to patients and not making irrational decisions because they don't want to get in trouble. It's important to know who's behind these problems in hospitals."
To Ben: (from thinking/writing team)
"Your project goes on to compare and contrast the benefits and downsides to both home births and hospital birth.
I really liked how you organized this post and was easy and interesting to read. I especially enjoyed reading about your mother's friend who experienced both, and showing how her response contrasted with your mother's opinion on home birth.
This matters to me because its difficult to make decisions about where to give birth when both sides have their own arguments. Your post clearly summarized the important aspects of the unit in addition to interviewing people."
To Steph:
"For this project, you focused on adoption and specifically if they accepted homosexual adoption.
I really enjoyed your speech and post because adoption was a topic that was barely covered. I liked that you actually took the initiative to call these agencies to see their opinions on homosexuality.
This project matters to me because I lack knowledge on adoption and the issue of homosexuality. This project made me question Leak and Watts and why you had too e-mail a director just for an answer if they accepted homosexual adoption. I found this project very interesting and brave to do."
To Sarah:
"Your post focuses on the history of birth and how things have drastically changed just within 100 years. Over time, birth has moved from home to hospital.
I really liked how organized and clear your post is, and your use of specific research to show the huge change in the history of birth. I especially enjoyed reading the story of the mother who gave birth in Central Africa and America and found it suprising how different it was.
This project matter to me because I have to agree that history helps us understand a topic a lot better. Reading this project has helped me give a better sense of how the history of birth has lead to this situation where most women in the U.S give birth in hospitals."
To Rossi:
"For this project, you had the experience of being able to interview three women at a hospital about their opinion on midwifery, obsterics, and the rise in c-section.
I really enjoyed reading this post in addition to listening to your elevator speech. The three women you interviewed had different reactions and opinions which was very interesting.
This matters to me because its always nice to listen to the opinion of the people who actually work in hospitals. I found it suprising that one of the interviewed women was open about her opinions about midwifery, and I find a relief in a way."
------------------------------------------------------------------
From David:
"Megumi,
You examined the importance of c-sections, and the reason why it is chosen by women over natural birth even though it isn't a very good way to give birth. This was also an interesting topic that I looked into myself.
One aspect that I particularly valued was that you had well explained statistics on c-section rates in the United States.
A reason why your subject mattered to me was because I also looked into C-section rates in the United States as well as China because these rates were increasing even though C-sections have many harms.-David."
From Mom:
"I love your use of statistics and clear sources to support your claims surrounding the dangers of C-sections in the U.S. It's important to be aware and well informed about what the research says moreso than assuming what is safe just because society says so. I found this topic and post very interesting."
From Sarah:
"Megumi,
You focused on c-sections in the United States, specifically how they have dominated the nations birthing process.
One aspect that I appreciated was how although you were revealing information that is not so great, you carried a very calm yet firm tone throughout your blog post. I found it interesting that you wove your own ideas into your piece while still incorporating the general statistics.
Your project matters to me because I was a c-section baby, and the more I hear about the procedure the more I question how I was brought into this world. While I also know at this point that some day I would like to have children and it is good to be informed of this information before you even have to think about a decision.
The only thing I would suggest working on is a better tie between each of your paragraphs. Although each paragraph was strong on it's own, there seemed to lack a strong connection between all of your points. However, I was very impressed with your blog post, keep up the good work!"
From Angela: (Younger mentor)
""Birth should not be treated as an illness where the most common solution is a cesarean section. Homebirths and midwives seem inviting, but it’s difficult to make an alternative decision when we're faced with the sad assumption that hospitals are the best way to go for giving birth. Is home birth really safer than hospital birth? "
I thought as well that it was safer to give birth in a hospital rather than home birth. Things such as movies and everyday society promotes birth at a hospital. The statistics gave this a even bigger meaning to the post itself and gave me a better idea on how it really is. I wish there was more recent data to see if this remains true, and your ideas as well made this post stand out as well."
From Jay:
"Your fact backed, curiosity fueled look at cesarean sections was a nice read and without a doubt the most informative post I've read thus far. While we went into depth in this topic in class, you managed to compile the valuable facts and necessary information into one informative concise essay, very important in terms of educating the ignorant."
From Leticia:
"Hi megumi,
This is leticia.
I liked how you focused on c- sections in the United States, and it became high practice in the birthing process.
While reading your blog I liked how you explained the statistics on C-section rates in the United States. And how you explained the statistics but you added your ideas, which made the blog more interesting.
This matters to me because, From reading your blog and doing some research on my mine. This makes me think about was it because they mother needed or was it because the doctors just wanted to do?"
Wednesday, April 6, 2011
HW 42 - Pregnancy & birth culminating project
After reading Birth in the USA and watching The Business of Being Born, my views toward birth and pregnancy have changed full circle. I realized that society has engraved this assumption in my head that it is safe to give birth in a hospital. I began to question my views on Obstetricians and their use of medical interventions. The one aspect of birth and pregnancy I was most curious about were Cesarean sections. I decided to look up statistics of C-sections by mothers who decide to give birth in a hospital.
Since all Cesarean sections in the U.S are done in hospitals, I looked up some statistics about the national Cesarean rate. According to The National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS)’s data brief of March 2010, “In 2007, approximately 1.4 million women had a cesarean birth, representing 32% of all births, the highest rate ever recorded in the United States and higher than rates in most other industrialized countries.” (Fay Menacker, NCHS Data Brief). 2007 was the most recent piece of data that was collected concerning cesarean rates, which raises makes me question why there is no data for anything more recent. Even though the U.S is well known for being an industrialized country, it is a disappointment that this country’s C-section rate is increasing The U.S. Cesarean rate has increased by 53% from 1996 to 2007. NCHS also shows specific statistics, showing that all backgrounds and ages ending up having C-sections have increased. What concerned me the most was that C-section rates for all gestational (the baby) ages have increased as well. “During the decade, the cesarean rate for early preterm infants (less than 34 completed weeks of gestation) increased by 36%. Rates for infants born late preterm (34 to 36 completed weeks of gestation) and term and over (37 or more completed weeks of gestation) rose by almost 50%.” (Fay Menacker, NCHS Data Brief.) The graph also shows that C-sections for babies less than 34 weeks were more common than babies of 37 weeks and older. In general though, C-section rates are alarmingly high for any ages (both baby and mother.) On a side note, the data brief also has C-section rates by state, if anyone is curious.
The C-section rate in the U.S is unbelievably high though it is an industrialized country. Why is it so high though? According to an article from USA Today, the reason why the rate is so high may be because doctors are impatient. “Nearly half of the C-sections in women who were induced and in women with a previous C-section were performed before their cervix was dilated 6 centimeters.”(Rita Ruben, USA Today) The article also mentions that some women may be active when their cervix is at 6 centimeters, and usually the cervix is fully dilated at 10 centimeters. This means many cesareans happen because Obstetricians are rushing to get their patients in and out of the hospital.
Impatience should not be a reason to conduct a surgical procedure, especially when it is unnecessary and carries risks. Some risks associated with C-sections for the mother are, “Infection, heavy blood loss, blood clots, nausea, vomiting, and maternal death (about 18 in 100,000-for emergency C-sections.” (Web MD, Cesarean Section-Risks and Complications). For the infant some risks are, “Injury during delivery, need for special care in the neonatal intensive care unit, immature lungs, and breathing problems.” (Web MD, Cesarean Section-Risks and Complications).
Based on this research it is reasonable to say that Obstetricians have selfish motives in conducting Cesareans, a procedure that should only happen when it is necessary. C-sections also carry health risks for the mother and baby, and again, should not be a procedure used so often.
Birth should not be treated as an illness where the most common solution is a cesarean section. Homebirths and midwives seem inviting, but it’s difficult to make an alternative decision when we're faced with the sad assumption that hospitals are the best way to go for giving birth. Is home birth really safer than hospital birth?
What many people do not realize (and something I didn’t know before the birth unit) is that there are different types of midwives. According to the American Pregnancy Association, there are at least five types of midwives: Certified Nurse Midwife, Certified Professional Midwife, Direct-entry midwife, certified midwife, and a lay midwife. APA has a great summary of each description.
(http://www.americanpregnancy.org/labornbirth/midwives.html)
I tried looking up statistics for homebirths but had trouble finding the actual statistics. This may just mean that hospitals are where the majority of births in the U.S happen so there's not enough data for home births.
Works Cited:
*Healthwise, . "Cesarean Section - Risks and Complications." WebMD. Healthwise, 24 02 2010. Web. 6 Apr 2011..
* Menacker, Fay. "Recent Tends in Cesarean Delivery in the United States." National Center for Health Statistics 03 2010. n. pag. Natality Data File.. Web. 6 Apr 2011..
*"Midwives." American Pregnancy Association (2011): n. pag. Web. 6 Apr 2011..
*Rubin, Rita. "Why has the USA's cesarean section rate climbed so high?." USA Today (2010): n. pag. Web. 6 Apr 2011..
Since all Cesarean sections in the U.S are done in hospitals, I looked up some statistics about the national Cesarean rate. According to The National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS)’s data brief of March 2010, “In 2007, approximately 1.4 million women had a cesarean birth, representing 32% of all births, the highest rate ever recorded in the United States and higher than rates in most other industrialized countries.” (Fay Menacker, NCHS Data Brief). 2007 was the most recent piece of data that was collected concerning cesarean rates, which raises makes me question why there is no data for anything more recent. Even though the U.S is well known for being an industrialized country, it is a disappointment that this country’s C-section rate is increasing The U.S. Cesarean rate has increased by 53% from 1996 to 2007. NCHS also shows specific statistics, showing that all backgrounds and ages ending up having C-sections have increased. What concerned me the most was that C-section rates for all gestational (the baby) ages have increased as well. “During the decade, the cesarean rate for early preterm infants (less than 34 completed weeks of gestation) increased by 36%. Rates for infants born late preterm (34 to 36 completed weeks of gestation) and term and over (37 or more completed weeks of gestation) rose by almost 50%.” (Fay Menacker, NCHS Data Brief.) The graph also shows that C-sections for babies less than 34 weeks were more common than babies of 37 weeks and older. In general though, C-section rates are alarmingly high for any ages (both baby and mother.) On a side note, the data brief also has C-section rates by state, if anyone is curious.
The C-section rate in the U.S is unbelievably high though it is an industrialized country. Why is it so high though? According to an article from USA Today, the reason why the rate is so high may be because doctors are impatient. “Nearly half of the C-sections in women who were induced and in women with a previous C-section were performed before their cervix was dilated 6 centimeters.”(Rita Ruben, USA Today) The article also mentions that some women may be active when their cervix is at 6 centimeters, and usually the cervix is fully dilated at 10 centimeters. This means many cesareans happen because Obstetricians are rushing to get their patients in and out of the hospital.
Impatience should not be a reason to conduct a surgical procedure, especially when it is unnecessary and carries risks. Some risks associated with C-sections for the mother are, “Infection, heavy blood loss, blood clots, nausea, vomiting, and maternal death (about 18 in 100,000-for emergency C-sections.” (Web MD, Cesarean Section-Risks and Complications). For the infant some risks are, “Injury during delivery, need for special care in the neonatal intensive care unit, immature lungs, and breathing problems.” (Web MD, Cesarean Section-Risks and Complications).
Based on this research it is reasonable to say that Obstetricians have selfish motives in conducting Cesareans, a procedure that should only happen when it is necessary. C-sections also carry health risks for the mother and baby, and again, should not be a procedure used so often.
Birth should not be treated as an illness where the most common solution is a cesarean section. Homebirths and midwives seem inviting, but it’s difficult to make an alternative decision when we're faced with the sad assumption that hospitals are the best way to go for giving birth. Is home birth really safer than hospital birth?
What many people do not realize (and something I didn’t know before the birth unit) is that there are different types of midwives. According to the American Pregnancy Association, there are at least five types of midwives: Certified Nurse Midwife, Certified Professional Midwife, Direct-entry midwife, certified midwife, and a lay midwife. APA has a great summary of each description.
(http://www.americanpregnancy.org/labornbirth/midwives.html)
I tried looking up statistics for homebirths but had trouble finding the actual statistics. This may just mean that hospitals are where the majority of births in the U.S happen so there's not enough data for home births.
Works Cited:
*Healthwise, . "Cesarean Section - Risks and Complications." WebMD. Healthwise, 24 02 2010. Web. 6 Apr 2011.
* Menacker, Fay. "Recent Tends in Cesarean Delivery in the United States." National Center for Health Statistics 03 2010. n. pag. Natality Data File.. Web. 6 Apr 2011.
*"Midwives." American Pregnancy Association (2011): n. pag. Web. 6 Apr 2011.
*Rubin, Rita. "Why has the USA's cesarean section rate climbed so high?." USA Today (2010): n. pag. Web. 6 Apr 2011.
Tuesday, March 29, 2011
HW#41: Independent Research
Aspect: ACOG versus midwives arguments
A.) Annotated Bibliogaphy:
1.) Arnold, Jill. "New ACOG Opinion on Home Birth Touts Rights, Nixes HBAC and CPMs." Theunnecesarean.com. Unnecesarean, 21 Jan 2011. Web. 29 Mar 2011..
--> This article argues from the perspective of the ACOG on home birth. They argue here that though they believe women should have the right to decide where to give birth, women should know the risks of homebirth. They also emphasize that timely transportation to a hospital will lead to good home birth outcomes.
I think this is a useful source because these are some of the arguments from ACOG who aren't really for home births. Even if a women decides to give birth with midwives, ACOG still wants them to visit hospitals which I find odd. Since I also read 'Birth in the USA' I can't help but question on what evidence ACOG is saying that home birth has an "increased risk of neonatal death," compared to hospital birth.
This resource furthered my opinion that ACOG may be lying about some of their arguments of why hospital birth is better than home birth. This source made me want to look up the actual data ACOG bases their opinion on.
2.)"The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Issues Opinion." ACOG. American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 20 Jan 2011. Web. 29 Mar 2011..
--> This is the ACOG website, so obviously they are arguing against homebirth. They use the same arguments as used from the first source I chose, but with more advice that seem alarming to me. Here, ACOG lists conditions of women who should not have home births-making midwives seem as though their capabilities during the birth process is limited severly. They also emphasize the use of screening and prenatal care in home births.
I would have been convinced by these opinions if I had not read the book for the birth unit. ACOG's opinions on home births still seem vague and questionable. ACOG also urges prenatal care if women are choosing to do home births. I'm not sure if ACOG's arguments that hospital birth is 'more safe' than home births is reliable enough.
3.)Blue, Laura. "Why Do U.S. Infants Die Too Often?." TIME 13 May 2008: n. pag. Web. 29 Mar 2011..
--> This article seems a bit on the Obsterics side, but admits the problems of hospital care in the U.S. as a statician. Babies in the U.S mortality rate for babies is horrible despite it being a developed country. The main reason is because babies are too small or has a low birth weight. The writer also mentions about medical interventions, inducing labor, and pre-term C-sections.
This is written from the view of a statician, so clearly numbers are showing that medical interventions and C-sections are causing U.S baby mortality rates to keep rising. This shows that OBGYB's interventions are not for the benefit of the mother or child.
4.)Warren, Jaime. "Cytotec: From Ulcers To Inductions." CaesareanBirth.Com (2003): n. pag. Web. 29 Mar 2011..
---> This article talks about the risks of Cytotec, the most cheapest and most commonly used drug for inducing labor in hospitals. These risks are more severe than Pitocin, and causes death or severe damage to the fetus. Doctors in hospitals continue to use Cytotec even though it is only FDA approved for treating ulcers.
5.)"Misoprostol." PubMed health. National Center for Biotechnology Information, 01 Sep 2008. Web. 29 Mar 2011.
--> To confirm the dangers of Cytotec, I looked up the drug itself. (Misoprostol is another word for Cytotec). Clearly, Cytotec has dangers for preganant women, and still is used for inducing labor. It can cause miscarridge, premature labor, and other birth defects.
This supports that something is wrong with hospital birth. OBGYN's are allowed to use a drug that is not recommended for pregnant women. Cytotec puts the baby (and the mother's) life in danger, and it is unnecessary.
B.)So far, from these resources I was able to confirm the dangers of giving birth in hospitals, and the amount of statistics/data that show that hospital birth is not really as safe as ACOG says. I am considering to write an essay for the project, emphasizing the dangers and risks of hospital births in the USA. I feel as if the public does not know enough because of the assumption that hospitals are reliable all the time. Hopefully, the essay can convince people who are for hospital birth that perhaps this dominant practice of going to a hospital is questionable-and only helps doctors to take advantage of this assumption.
A.) Annotated Bibliogaphy:
1.) Arnold, Jill. "New ACOG Opinion on Home Birth Touts Rights, Nixes HBAC and CPMs." Theunnecesarean.com. Unnecesarean, 21 Jan 2011. Web. 29 Mar 2011.
--> This article argues from the perspective of the ACOG on home birth. They argue here that though they believe women should have the right to decide where to give birth, women should know the risks of homebirth. They also emphasize that timely transportation to a hospital will lead to good home birth outcomes.
I think this is a useful source because these are some of the arguments from ACOG who aren't really for home births. Even if a women decides to give birth with midwives, ACOG still wants them to visit hospitals which I find odd. Since I also read 'Birth in the USA' I can't help but question on what evidence ACOG is saying that home birth has an "increased risk of neonatal death," compared to hospital birth.
This resource furthered my opinion that ACOG may be lying about some of their arguments of why hospital birth is better than home birth. This source made me want to look up the actual data ACOG bases their opinion on.
2.)"The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Issues Opinion." ACOG. American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 20 Jan 2011. Web. 29 Mar 2011.
--> This is the ACOG website, so obviously they are arguing against homebirth. They use the same arguments as used from the first source I chose, but with more advice that seem alarming to me. Here, ACOG lists conditions of women who should not have home births-making midwives seem as though their capabilities during the birth process is limited severly. They also emphasize the use of screening and prenatal care in home births.
I would have been convinced by these opinions if I had not read the book for the birth unit. ACOG's opinions on home births still seem vague and questionable. ACOG also urges prenatal care if women are choosing to do home births. I'm not sure if ACOG's arguments that hospital birth is 'more safe' than home births is reliable enough.
3.)Blue, Laura. "Why Do U.S. Infants Die Too Often?." TIME 13 May 2008: n. pag. Web. 29 Mar 2011.
--> This article seems a bit on the Obsterics side, but admits the problems of hospital care in the U.S. as a statician. Babies in the U.S mortality rate for babies is horrible despite it being a developed country. The main reason is because babies are too small or has a low birth weight. The writer also mentions about medical interventions, inducing labor, and pre-term C-sections.
This is written from the view of a statician, so clearly numbers are showing that medical interventions and C-sections are causing U.S baby mortality rates to keep rising. This shows that OBGYB's interventions are not for the benefit of the mother or child.
4.)Warren, Jaime. "Cytotec: From Ulcers To Inductions." CaesareanBirth.Com (2003): n. pag. Web. 29 Mar 2011.
---> This article talks about the risks of Cytotec, the most cheapest and most commonly used drug for inducing labor in hospitals. These risks are more severe than Pitocin, and causes death or severe damage to the fetus. Doctors in hospitals continue to use Cytotec even though it is only FDA approved for treating ulcers.
5.)"Misoprostol." PubMed health. National Center for Biotechnology Information, 01 Sep 2008. Web. 29 Mar 2011.
--> To confirm the dangers of Cytotec, I looked up the drug itself. (Misoprostol is another word for Cytotec). Clearly, Cytotec has dangers for preganant women, and still is used for inducing labor. It can cause miscarridge, premature labor, and other birth defects.
This supports that something is wrong with hospital birth. OBGYN's are allowed to use a drug that is not recommended for pregnant women. Cytotec puts the baby (and the mother's) life in danger, and it is unnecessary.
B.)So far, from these resources I was able to confirm the dangers of giving birth in hospitals, and the amount of statistics/data that show that hospital birth is not really as safe as ACOG says. I am considering to write an essay for the project, emphasizing the dangers and risks of hospital births in the USA. I feel as if the public does not know enough because of the assumption that hospitals are reliable all the time. Hopefully, the essay can convince people who are for hospital birth that perhaps this dominant practice of going to a hospital is questionable-and only helps doctors to take advantage of this assumption.
Monday, March 28, 2011
HW#40: Insights from Book Part 3
You find yourself at a cocktail party with the author of the book you just finished reading. To demonstrate that you really read it, you say, "Hey - thanks for writing "Born in the USA: How a Broken Maternity System myst be Fixed to put Women and Children First". Your main idea, explaining the dangers of the maternity care system in the USA and your solutions to those problems made me rethink about pregnancy & birth."
But the author, surprised to be talking to someone who instead of sharing their own birth story actually rephrased the main idea of the text he spent months giving birth to asks, "Really, which parts were most effective or important for you?" When you answer, "Well, in the last third of the book you focused on the actual solutions and alternative ways of improving the broken maternity system we have in the U.S, which further developed the first 2/3rds of the book. But let me be more specific." And then you listed the top 3 ideas/pieces of evidence/insights/questions from that final third of the book (and somehow even listed page number references).
1. Communication between Obstetricians and midwives are essential. (page 206)
2. Litigation helps protects women, letting them speak out if they know their childbirth process was unnecessary and dangerous. (page 225)
3. Women should be able to choose their care provider, their birth place, and have her own birth plan that will be carried out even in hospitals. (page 248)
At this point, realizing that he's having a unique conversation with a serious reader of his book, the author asks - "But what could I have done to make this a better book - that would more effectively fulfill its mission?" You answer, "Well, let's be clear - your text sought to provide narratives, historical analysis, journalistic analysis, and policy analysis from the perspective of both mothers whose choices are limited in giving birth and the obstetricians for the book-reading-public to better understand pregnancy & birth in our culture. Given that aim, and your book, the best advice I would give for a 2nd edition of the text would be, to actually find obstetricians who can speak more in depth about their ignorance on the normal birth process. But I don't want you to feel like I'm criticizing. I appreciate the immense amount of labor you dedicated to this important issue and particularly for making me think about how our society depends on Obstetricians without questioning their medical and unnecessary interventions & the reasons why OBGYN's use these inerventions (because of fear of litigation and ignorance of seeing childbirth as a natural process. In fact, I'm likely to consider home birth and look up actual data to make sure Obstetricians aren't putting myself and a potential child at risk if I do give birth in a hospital as a result of your book." The author replies, "Thanks! Talking to you gives me hope about our future as a society!"
But the author, surprised to be talking to someone who instead of sharing their own birth story actually rephrased the main idea of the text he spent months giving birth to asks, "Really, which parts were most effective or important for you?" When you answer, "Well, in the last third of the book you focused on the actual solutions and alternative ways of improving the broken maternity system we have in the U.S, which further developed the first 2/3rds of the book. But let me be more specific." And then you listed the top 3 ideas/pieces of evidence/insights/questions from that final third of the book (and somehow even listed page number references).
1. Communication between Obstetricians and midwives are essential. (page 206)
2. Litigation helps protects women, letting them speak out if they know their childbirth process was unnecessary and dangerous. (page 225)
3. Women should be able to choose their care provider, their birth place, and have her own birth plan that will be carried out even in hospitals. (page 248)
At this point, realizing that he's having a unique conversation with a serious reader of his book, the author asks - "But what could I have done to make this a better book - that would more effectively fulfill its mission?" You answer, "Well, let's be clear - your text sought to provide narratives, historical analysis, journalistic analysis, and policy analysis from the perspective of both mothers whose choices are limited in giving birth and the obstetricians for the book-reading-public to better understand pregnancy & birth in our culture. Given that aim, and your book, the best advice I would give for a 2nd edition of the text would be, to actually find obstetricians who can speak more in depth about their ignorance on the normal birth process. But I don't want you to feel like I'm criticizing. I appreciate the immense amount of labor you dedicated to this important issue and particularly for making me think about how our society depends on Obstetricians without questioning their medical and unnecessary interventions & the reasons why OBGYN's use these inerventions (because of fear of litigation and ignorance of seeing childbirth as a natural process. In fact, I'm likely to consider home birth and look up actual data to make sure Obstetricians aren't putting myself and a potential child at risk if I do give birth in a hospital as a result of your book." The author replies, "Thanks! Talking to you gives me hope about our future as a society!"
Tuesday, March 22, 2011
HW#39: Insights from Book part 2
1.) Wagner, Marsden. Born in the USA: How a Broken Maternity System must be Fixed to put Women and Children first. California: University of California Press, 2006. Print.
In general, the book and the film exspress a strong opinion for home birth over hospital birth. The book had a few things that was not mentioned in the film that I found important or interesting though.
-Having midwives was like common sense in 1452 in Germany.
-The start of the 19th century, marked the turning point of negative attitudes toward midwives. They were accused of witchcraft.
-There were cases in California where midwives were harassed and had random searches.
-Males in general are afraid of child birth and having no control (That's why they dissaprove midwives/home births)
-Despite research, ABC's (Alternative Birth Centers) are outlawed in Illinois.
-"Obstetricians are sued more than physicians in any other specialty." (Page 152)
2.) In the second hundred pages, the author goes more into depth about the difference between Obstetricians and midwives. Though research supports that midwives are safe, obstetricians make an effort to make themselves seem like the best choice. Obstetricians want control and are afraid of the process of birth.
Response: My attitudes toward OBGYN's completely changed. I was hoping that all doctors prioritize what is best for the patient/client over themselves. They're selfish that they put themselves before the mother/child. The system is corrupt and puts midwives in a disadvantage when doctors should be learning from them.
3a.) The public should know that, "Obstericians are sued more then physicians in any other specialty." (Page 152)
3b.) The public should know that there are legal protections for pregnant and birthing mothers that most women and health care professionals know very little of. (Page 173)
3c.) The public should know that ACOG allow obstetricians to use litigation to maintain monopoly. (Page 169)
3d.)The public should know that Obstetricians are afraid of litigation, causing them to turn to C-sections. (Page 154)
3e.)The public should know that midwives have been harassed before. There was a case in California where a midwife was randomly searched at her home because she was a midwife.
4.)I wanted to confirm about the liability issue with Obstetricians. I found a survey by ACOG that confirmed what the book said about sues and litigations.
"90.5% of respondents indicated they experienced at least one professional liability claim filed against
them during their professional careers, an average of 2.69 claims per ob‐gyn."
I also found that for claims on Obstetricians, "impaired infant claims" were the most common, with death of the baby as the second claim.
(http://www.acog.org/departments/professionalLiability/2009PLSurveyNational.pdf)
In general, the book and the film exspress a strong opinion for home birth over hospital birth. The book had a few things that was not mentioned in the film that I found important or interesting though.
-Having midwives was like common sense in 1452 in Germany.
-The start of the 19th century, marked the turning point of negative attitudes toward midwives. They were accused of witchcraft.
-There were cases in California where midwives were harassed and had random searches.
-Males in general are afraid of child birth and having no control (That's why they dissaprove midwives/home births)
-Despite research, ABC's (Alternative Birth Centers) are outlawed in Illinois.
-"Obstetricians are sued more than physicians in any other specialty." (Page 152)
2.) In the second hundred pages, the author goes more into depth about the difference between Obstetricians and midwives. Though research supports that midwives are safe, obstetricians make an effort to make themselves seem like the best choice. Obstetricians want control and are afraid of the process of birth.
Response: My attitudes toward OBGYN's completely changed. I was hoping that all doctors prioritize what is best for the patient/client over themselves. They're selfish that they put themselves before the mother/child. The system is corrupt and puts midwives in a disadvantage when doctors should be learning from them.
3a.) The public should know that, "Obstericians are sued more then physicians in any other specialty." (Page 152)
3b.) The public should know that there are legal protections for pregnant and birthing mothers that most women and health care professionals know very little of. (Page 173)
3c.) The public should know that ACOG allow obstetricians to use litigation to maintain monopoly. (Page 169)
3d.)The public should know that Obstetricians are afraid of litigation, causing them to turn to C-sections. (Page 154)
3e.)The public should know that midwives have been harassed before. There was a case in California where a midwife was randomly searched at her home because she was a midwife.
4.)I wanted to confirm about the liability issue with Obstetricians. I found a survey by ACOG that confirmed what the book said about sues and litigations.
"90.5% of respondents indicated they experienced at least one professional liability claim filed against
them during their professional careers, an average of 2.69 claims per ob‐gyn."
I also found that for claims on Obstetricians, "impaired infant claims" were the most common, with death of the baby as the second claim.
(http://www.acog.org/departments/professionalLiability/2009PLSurveyNational.pdf)
Monday, March 14, 2011
HW#38: Insights from pregnancy and birth book-part 1
"Born in the USA" By: Marsden Wagner, M.D., M.S.
1.) The book is broken into chapters that goes into depth of one of the problems involving OBGYN's the author believes should be informed to women in general. These chapters all revolve (so far) about the information doctors never tell patients for their own benefit.
2.) The last paragraph of the first chapter shows an overview of what the author will be investigating throughtout the book, "This book is designed to further an understanding of problems in the maternity care system in the United States." (Page 12) The essential question is would be, What is wrong with the U.S maternity health care system and what solutions are there?
Response: The problems of the maternity system is clearly written in the book, and I find the author reliable enough to gain my trust. He goes out of his way to write a book and hold speeches because of his strong belief in the right of women to be informed of their birthing process. I don't think there is a simple solution because the whole system would have to undergo change.
3.) The major insight from the book is that doctors in the maternity care system put themselves before patients. "The second reason obstetricians want more women to have C-sections is to avoid litigation. Obstetricians are desperate to stay out of courtrooms where, unlike in hospitals, they are vulnerable..." (Page 39)There were other reasons mentioned as well such as for their own convenience and taking less time for the process.
Response: This is both a shock and dissapointment to me. This insight made me realize how clueless I am about too dependent I am on doctors. This is frustrating because I really thought C-sections were only conducted for necessary reasons.
4a.) The public should be clearly notified of the rate of unnesessary C-sections in the U.S.
b.) The public should know that ACOG has no scientific data to support their clain that hospital birth is safer than home birth.
c.)The public should know that 'choosing to have a C-section even when its not medically necessary' can lead to the mother and/or baby to die.
d.)The public should know that C-sections usually happen on weekdays when its more convenient for the doctor, not necessarily the patient.
e.) The public should know that mothers give birth in a certain position only for the doctors benefit. Doctors are not even willing to be below the women even if it will make the birth process more natural.
5.) The author uses the voices of different perspectives to argue his point. He mentions actual birth stories of mothers, statistical data, and questions authorities in meetings. I find the evidence reliable because it is data that is usually hidden from the public. The evidences he uses to back up his claims are redundant though in each chapter.
1.) The book is broken into chapters that goes into depth of one of the problems involving OBGYN's the author believes should be informed to women in general. These chapters all revolve (so far) about the information doctors never tell patients for their own benefit.
2.) The last paragraph of the first chapter shows an overview of what the author will be investigating throughtout the book, "This book is designed to further an understanding of problems in the maternity care system in the United States." (Page 12) The essential question is would be, What is wrong with the U.S maternity health care system and what solutions are there?
Response: The problems of the maternity system is clearly written in the book, and I find the author reliable enough to gain my trust. He goes out of his way to write a book and hold speeches because of his strong belief in the right of women to be informed of their birthing process. I don't think there is a simple solution because the whole system would have to undergo change.
3.) The major insight from the book is that doctors in the maternity care system put themselves before patients. "The second reason obstetricians want more women to have C-sections is to avoid litigation. Obstetricians are desperate to stay out of courtrooms where, unlike in hospitals, they are vulnerable..." (Page 39)There were other reasons mentioned as well such as for their own convenience and taking less time for the process.
Response: This is both a shock and dissapointment to me. This insight made me realize how clueless I am about too dependent I am on doctors. This is frustrating because I really thought C-sections were only conducted for necessary reasons.
4a.) The public should be clearly notified of the rate of unnesessary C-sections in the U.S.
b.) The public should know that ACOG has no scientific data to support their clain that hospital birth is safer than home birth.
c.)The public should know that 'choosing to have a C-section even when its not medically necessary' can lead to the mother and/or baby to die.
d.)The public should know that C-sections usually happen on weekdays when its more convenient for the doctor, not necessarily the patient.
e.) The public should know that mothers give birth in a certain position only for the doctors benefit. Doctors are not even willing to be below the women even if it will make the birth process more natural.
5.) The author uses the voices of different perspectives to argue his point. He mentions actual birth stories of mothers, statistical data, and questions authorities in meetings. I find the evidence reliable because it is data that is usually hidden from the public. The evidences he uses to back up his claims are redundant though in each chapter.
Tuesday, March 1, 2011
HW 37: Comments on Birth & Pregnancy Stories
Comments to other group members:
To Raven:
"I found your post really interesting. The post made me re-think about the difficulty and feelings that comes across people during the process of birth. A line in particular that I liked was, "When she became pregnant it was no longer about herself, it was about “I have a baby growing inside of me, what I need to do to take care of this child?” She also began talking about how through raising children you are able to reflect and change some of the things you were brought up with." This is a pattern I notice with the people I interviewed as well. I think its because a new life brings joy but also a responsibility. And, raising a child is no easy task so mothers always learn a few life lessons along the way. This makes me wonder if there is such a thing as an 'ideal' way to raise a child if the parent is also in a way learning from the new life."
To Ben:
"I found your post really interesting. I also interviewed a teen mother where the father also stayed by her side. I was really moved because I saw photos of the couple holding and smiling at the new born. This furthered my question of whether teen pregnancy is really all that bad if it is raised by loving parents. A line I liked was, "In fact, he did not even mention the possibility of abortion to her, and when she finally brought it up as something she would prefer not to do, he agreed 100 percent. This was practically shocking to me; its as if this 17 year old boy who has not even finished high school yet feels that he is ready and wants a child." This may seem irrational at first, but I also think that the idea of birth provokes the decision of not doing abortion if it is the killing of a new life."
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comments on my HW#36
From Raven:
"I enjoyed reading the account of your birth and it’s interesting that you mentioned the experience a person has with giving birth. I have always wondered what makes someone more experienced with giving birth than the next person and that is something I hope to learn in this unit. I also liked the line: “Living in Japan, my mother was affected by the assumptions people made about marriage and birth. This made me wonder if the culture here, in America, affects our decisions about pregnancy and birth as well.” I do believe the cultures in our society do influencec the way we view the process of pregnancy and birth because we follow the cultures of our society. I enjoyed reading your blog."
From Mom:
"I really enjoyed reading your post. I was also surprised about the teen mother, but through your post I found myself agreeing. If the mother has no regret with the child and really cherishes the new life, society should not be putting mothers down just because of age. A line I liked was, "My interview with her contradicted all my negative images of teen pregnancy. This dosn't mean we should have babies at a young age-but I'm starting to think it isn't always bad as long as your responsible enough."
From Ben:
"I was inspired by the amount of interesting ideas that I had not previously thought about that you were able to fit into this post. For instance, the way you describe your mothers reasons for having a child was largely based on cultural practices was very eye-opening for me. However, your most thought provoking line in my opinion was, "At first I felt bad for her, but I learned from her that having a baby at a young age isn't a 'mistake.' At least she dosn't think so. Why does our culture put down teen pregnancy so much?" This sentence really made me realize that so many people in our society look down on teen pregnancy, and yet usually don't provide any legitimate reasoning or evidence for their opinions. Great job!"
From Angela (Younger Commentor)
""Why does our culture put down teen pregnancy so much?"
I have to agree with this line because where my family is from, in Mexico it is quite common for most teenagers to be pregnant at this age, if not by their 20's. It seems that depending the culture, it will either reject or accept this idea. It was great that you got 3 people with 3 different experiences on the exact same subject and I feel that you also may have changed my mind a little. Maybe as long as you have the right support pregnancy shouldnt be looked as bad."
To Raven:
"I found your post really interesting. The post made me re-think about the difficulty and feelings that comes across people during the process of birth. A line in particular that I liked was, "When she became pregnant it was no longer about herself, it was about “I have a baby growing inside of me, what I need to do to take care of this child?” She also began talking about how through raising children you are able to reflect and change some of the things you were brought up with." This is a pattern I notice with the people I interviewed as well. I think its because a new life brings joy but also a responsibility. And, raising a child is no easy task so mothers always learn a few life lessons along the way. This makes me wonder if there is such a thing as an 'ideal' way to raise a child if the parent is also in a way learning from the new life."
To Ben:
"I found your post really interesting. I also interviewed a teen mother where the father also stayed by her side. I was really moved because I saw photos of the couple holding and smiling at the new born. This furthered my question of whether teen pregnancy is really all that bad if it is raised by loving parents. A line I liked was, "In fact, he did not even mention the possibility of abortion to her, and when she finally brought it up as something she would prefer not to do, he agreed 100 percent. This was practically shocking to me; its as if this 17 year old boy who has not even finished high school yet feels that he is ready and wants a child." This may seem irrational at first, but I also think that the idea of birth provokes the decision of not doing abortion if it is the killing of a new life."
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comments on my HW#36
From Raven:
"I enjoyed reading the account of your birth and it’s interesting that you mentioned the experience a person has with giving birth. I have always wondered what makes someone more experienced with giving birth than the next person and that is something I hope to learn in this unit. I also liked the line: “Living in Japan, my mother was affected by the assumptions people made about marriage and birth. This made me wonder if the culture here, in America, affects our decisions about pregnancy and birth as well.” I do believe the cultures in our society do influencec the way we view the process of pregnancy and birth because we follow the cultures of our society. I enjoyed reading your blog."
From Mom:
"I really enjoyed reading your post. I was also surprised about the teen mother, but through your post I found myself agreeing. If the mother has no regret with the child and really cherishes the new life, society should not be putting mothers down just because of age. A line I liked was, "My interview with her contradicted all my negative images of teen pregnancy. This dosn't mean we should have babies at a young age-but I'm starting to think it isn't always bad as long as your responsible enough."
From Ben:
"I was inspired by the amount of interesting ideas that I had not previously thought about that you were able to fit into this post. For instance, the way you describe your mothers reasons for having a child was largely based on cultural practices was very eye-opening for me. However, your most thought provoking line in my opinion was, "At first I felt bad for her, but I learned from her that having a baby at a young age isn't a 'mistake.' At least she dosn't think so. Why does our culture put down teen pregnancy so much?" This sentence really made me realize that so many people in our society look down on teen pregnancy, and yet usually don't provide any legitimate reasoning or evidence for their opinions. Great job!"
From Angela (Younger Commentor)
""Why does our culture put down teen pregnancy so much?"
I have to agree with this line because where my family is from, in Mexico it is quite common for most teenagers to be pregnant at this age, if not by their 20's. It seems that depending the culture, it will either reject or accept this idea. It was great that you got 3 people with 3 different experiences on the exact same subject and I feel that you also may have changed my mind a little. Maybe as long as you have the right support pregnancy shouldnt be looked as bad."
Monday, February 21, 2011
HW#36: Pregnancy & Birth Stories
1.) I felt a bit awkward as I sat next to my mother telling a story about me. She showed me a medical and welfare record of my daily growth-as though it was like her little treasure. When I asked her what influnced her to have a baby, she simply answered that in Japan it was assumed that when you get married, you have a child. It was a cultural influence. But regardless, she was happy that there was a new life growing inside of her. Nine months felt like forever to her and she wanted the baby to hurry up and come out. It was also a busy period for her as well-she was actually preparing to move to NY and had to finish papers. I was supposed to be due two days later, but my mother knew something was odd when she felt pain. She called the hospital but was told to just rest at home. She could not sleep at all and even when she went to the hospital the next day it wasn't until night time that I finally came out. The birth process was long and uncomfortable. Her thighs hurt instead of the stomache and my mother could tell the nurse never experienced birth herself.
Despite the fact that it was a bit odd asking my own mother how it felt giving birth to myself-I found myself understanding and agreeing with her opinions and thoughts. Living in Japan, my mother was affected by the assumptions people made about marridge and birth. This made me wonder if the culture here, in America, affects our decisions about pregnancy and birth as well. My mother's story also confirmed my understanding that pregnancy is not only a period of excitement-but it is also a period of stress and impatience. Nine months is a long time period. The moment of giving birth is even more tiresome and even painful. The comment she made about the nurse having no experience in birth made me wonder if its better if doctors who help deliver babies have birth experiences themselves.
2.)I knew teen pregnancy was commonplace, but I didn't think I end up knowing someone in that situation. I was shocked when I found out and had no idea how to react. I felt guilty for asking her questions for a history homework but she ended up telling me to ask her anything and that she trusts me to keep her anonymous. The pregnancy was unexpected but she is thankful for the new life. She worried about being able to graduate while having the responsibility of a child but I could tell she also has affections and loving feelings to the baby. When she found out about her pregnancy, she read as many books as she can about birth and pregnancy. She took walks until the 8th and 9th month. She also mentioned about how emotional she was.
At first I felt bad for her, but I learned from her that having a baby at a young age isn't a 'mistake.' At least she dosn't think so. Why does our culture put down teen pregnancy so much? I had to wonder this while I heard her story. She puts effort in her child while still being able to focus on school. A mother should be loving and responsible, so I think she will be a great mother despite the difficulties. I was also surprised that the father of the child is also willing to care and love for the child. I had a weird assumption that male teenagers don't want to do anything with a baby. My interview with her contradicted all my negative images of teen pregnancy. This dosn't mean we should have babies at a young age-but I'm starting to think it isn't always bad as long as your responsible enough.
3.) I actually found similar answers from this interviewee. She decided to have a baby with her husband after they both finished college and had a stable income. She found support from family members as well which helped her a lot through her pregnancy. Though the situation is the complete opposite from the teen mother, what they did during pregnancy were similar. She researched everything she can about birth and even excersized. She barely felt sick, but mentioned about how emotional she was. She even cried at movies that she never cried at before her pregnancy. She also mentioned about feeling uncomfortable with looks from strangers. She's not a teen mother, but some strangers think she is from her appearance and she really didn't like that.
Pregnancy brings many emotional and physical problems. She had a lot of support which I found really important in times of pregnancy. Nine months with barely no support is most likely really overwhelming. I didn't get to find someone who went through birth with no support at all so it made me wonder how hard it must be in that kind of situation. She emphasized how glad she was her family and her husband was for their support.
I am curious to know more about the emotional and psychological aspect of birth. I'm curious if support from others affect people's decisions and feelings about birth.
Despite the fact that it was a bit odd asking my own mother how it felt giving birth to myself-I found myself understanding and agreeing with her opinions and thoughts. Living in Japan, my mother was affected by the assumptions people made about marridge and birth. This made me wonder if the culture here, in America, affects our decisions about pregnancy and birth as well. My mother's story also confirmed my understanding that pregnancy is not only a period of excitement-but it is also a period of stress and impatience. Nine months is a long time period. The moment of giving birth is even more tiresome and even painful. The comment she made about the nurse having no experience in birth made me wonder if its better if doctors who help deliver babies have birth experiences themselves.
2.)I knew teen pregnancy was commonplace, but I didn't think I end up knowing someone in that situation. I was shocked when I found out and had no idea how to react. I felt guilty for asking her questions for a history homework but she ended up telling me to ask her anything and that she trusts me to keep her anonymous. The pregnancy was unexpected but she is thankful for the new life. She worried about being able to graduate while having the responsibility of a child but I could tell she also has affections and loving feelings to the baby. When she found out about her pregnancy, she read as many books as she can about birth and pregnancy. She took walks until the 8th and 9th month. She also mentioned about how emotional she was.
At first I felt bad for her, but I learned from her that having a baby at a young age isn't a 'mistake.' At least she dosn't think so. Why does our culture put down teen pregnancy so much? I had to wonder this while I heard her story. She puts effort in her child while still being able to focus on school. A mother should be loving and responsible, so I think she will be a great mother despite the difficulties. I was also surprised that the father of the child is also willing to care and love for the child. I had a weird assumption that male teenagers don't want to do anything with a baby. My interview with her contradicted all my negative images of teen pregnancy. This dosn't mean we should have babies at a young age-but I'm starting to think it isn't always bad as long as your responsible enough.
3.) I actually found similar answers from this interviewee. She decided to have a baby with her husband after they both finished college and had a stable income. She found support from family members as well which helped her a lot through her pregnancy. Though the situation is the complete opposite from the teen mother, what they did during pregnancy were similar. She researched everything she can about birth and even excersized. She barely felt sick, but mentioned about how emotional she was. She even cried at movies that she never cried at before her pregnancy. She also mentioned about feeling uncomfortable with looks from strangers. She's not a teen mother, but some strangers think she is from her appearance and she really didn't like that.
Pregnancy brings many emotional and physical problems. She had a lot of support which I found really important in times of pregnancy. Nine months with barely no support is most likely really overwhelming. I didn't get to find someone who went through birth with no support at all so it made me wonder how hard it must be in that kind of situation. She emphasized how glad she was her family and her husband was for their support.
I am curious to know more about the emotional and psychological aspect of birth. I'm curious if support from others affect people's decisions and feelings about birth.
Thursday, February 17, 2011
HW#35: Other People's Perspective 1
I was actually relieved at the answers I received from my interviewees. All five of them had a strong belief that birth is beautiful and natural. Though the process of birth can be painful or stressful, a baby is the start of a new life that should be treasured and loved. One respondent mentioned that, "We live in a culture that is silencing toward women's bodies, especially silencing of birth. Being able to birth where you want and with whoever you want is an essential facet of the struggle for reproductive rights." I can tell from those words that she is strongly dissatisfied at today's culture because birth is indeed, a right. Even if society views birth in a negative way, our strong beliefs that birth is beautiful still stays.
Another respondent mentioned that, "you never know how much of an impact the new born can have on the world." I found myself agreeing with this statement. Every individual, every life, can contribute to the world we live in-which just shows that birth is beautiful. The only difference in answers was about the controversy of abortion, which is understandable. One views that abortion is the killing of a life while those who are for it strongly said that the choice should be there. A respondent said that an abortion should be a choice if the pregnant woman has too many financial problems to even take care of a child. Either way, I can see that both sides have strong beliefs because they find value in what is best for the baby.
It is obvious from these answers that their dominant perspective on birth is the sacredness of a new life and the potential it brings to the world. Most of the respondents had a clear opinion on abortion which is a dominant controversy. Experience of seeing a baby and hearing about 'how cute we were when we were babies' from our parents affect the majority to feel a strong importance and beauty in a new life. Though our culture may be silencing our rights to birth, many women find that birth is a great thing. I think our history has also shaped our perception of beauty because women had fought for the rights of abortion and privacy. Perhaps that feeling of having strong beliefs in our rights is still existent.
Another respondent mentioned that, "you never know how much of an impact the new born can have on the world." I found myself agreeing with this statement. Every individual, every life, can contribute to the world we live in-which just shows that birth is beautiful. The only difference in answers was about the controversy of abortion, which is understandable. One views that abortion is the killing of a life while those who are for it strongly said that the choice should be there. A respondent said that an abortion should be a choice if the pregnant woman has too many financial problems to even take care of a child. Either way, I can see that both sides have strong beliefs because they find value in what is best for the baby.
It is obvious from these answers that their dominant perspective on birth is the sacredness of a new life and the potential it brings to the world. Most of the respondents had a clear opinion on abortion which is a dominant controversy. Experience of seeing a baby and hearing about 'how cute we were when we were babies' from our parents affect the majority to feel a strong importance and beauty in a new life. Though our culture may be silencing our rights to birth, many women find that birth is a great thing. I think our history has also shaped our perception of beauty because women had fought for the rights of abortion and privacy. Perhaps that feeling of having strong beliefs in our rights is still existent.
Monday, February 14, 2011
HW#34: Some Initial Thoughts on Birth
To me, birth is a very confusing topic. I assume that its only polite to say congratulations to a pregnant mother. I never questioned why though. I guess its because society as a whole assumes that birth is something that is worth celebrating since it is the day of a new life on earth. I remember my mother's co-worker who held a dinner party to celebrate her pregnancy, and later I got to hold her baby after she gave birth. I agree that birth is something worth celebrating, but how did it all start? How do other countries celebrate or think about birth? Are there countries that perhaps don't look forward to a new birth? My positive assumptions towards birth now seems to be affected by the general opinion of the public.
But, on the other hand teenage mothers always depict negative associations. I found out recently that a classmate from a school got pregnant and cannot wait to see the child she will soon give birth to. I felt really awkward. Why do we turn away from teenage mothers? Is it because we assume they cannot be responsible enough to take care of the living? But, regardless of age, isn't the love of a mother to a child the same? Or is it different? I don't know, but it's something worth thinking about. our perceptions and associations with different aspects of birth are deeply affected by social standards and the media. I wonder if this unit as well, will have surpring truths revealed and have new thoughts developed through this unit.
But, on the other hand teenage mothers always depict negative associations. I found out recently that a classmate from a school got pregnant and cannot wait to see the child she will soon give birth to. I felt really awkward. Why do we turn away from teenage mothers? Is it because we assume they cannot be responsible enough to take care of the living? But, regardless of age, isn't the love of a mother to a child the same? Or is it different? I don't know, but it's something worth thinking about. our perceptions and associations with different aspects of birth are deeply affected by social standards and the media. I wonder if this unit as well, will have surpring truths revealed and have new thoughts developed through this unit.
Tuesday, January 25, 2011
HW#33: Comments
For Sarah:
"I really enjoyed reading your post! I found the post very detailed in imagery and grabbed my interest in reading it thoroughly. I agree that though death is unavoidable we should not fear death itself. I found this line very interesting, "Although what happens to our body isn’t always up to us, our minds and spirits are in our complete control. By knowing this the defeatist attitude about getting old, should be altered." I found this very insightful and I do agree that our negative attitude towards the elderly really needs to be changed. There is no shame in age."
For Stephanie:
"I found your post very insightful and I agree on your ideas-our society is indeed greedy and its silly how we do not have free health care. Its actually not that difficult because a lot of other countries as you mentioned-have universal free health care. A line in particular I liked was,"Overall America should be more opened minded about how they plan on helping American medical patients in the future." I found this very deep-and I do agree that by being more accepting we can have a better system for the ill and dying."
For Jay:
"I actually liked this post a lot because it took on a point of view that was not only different but also full of confidence. I especially liked the line, "I see it as capitalism at it's best. People seeing oppurtunity to profit where others do not." You make a good point about Capitalism and the point of the system is to profit. I found a lot of insights in your post and found it very interesting."
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comments on my HW#32:
From Mom:
"I really enjoyed this post. It was very clear and showed your reflection on what you felt toward the unit and the fear of death that still exists. I found this line very thoughful: "But, at the same time maybe there's no escape-and I'll just end up dying on a hospital bed wishing to be home surrounded by my family." We want our last moments to be a happy one, and sometimes its just scary to even think that it probably won't be. I agree that realistically as we grow old, we become more lonely while also hoping that the end of our lives won't be as lonesome."
From Stephanie:
"I was very impressed by this post, I sensed growth and a new level of maturity while reading through your final post about the unit. Just like you I am afraid what the future holds but I;m sure of one thing, I will not be dying in a nursing home or hospital. Your final thoughts were really strong and I enjoyed reading all your post about dying and illness. Keep up the great work!"
From Sarah:
"I found your post honest and real. Although you seem to have grown you still are unsure about how you want to lead your life, which is perfectly fine. I thought it was interesting that even after all we know about hospitals you still would go to one in a time of need. Honestly, I would probably do the same. I think your writing and insights have grown, and this is very evident especially in this post. Great Job Megumi! :)"
"I really enjoyed reading your post! I found the post very detailed in imagery and grabbed my interest in reading it thoroughly. I agree that though death is unavoidable we should not fear death itself. I found this line very interesting, "Although what happens to our body isn’t always up to us, our minds and spirits are in our complete control. By knowing this the defeatist attitude about getting old, should be altered." I found this very insightful and I do agree that our negative attitude towards the elderly really needs to be changed. There is no shame in age."
For Stephanie:
"I found your post very insightful and I agree on your ideas-our society is indeed greedy and its silly how we do not have free health care. Its actually not that difficult because a lot of other countries as you mentioned-have universal free health care. A line in particular I liked was,"Overall America should be more opened minded about how they plan on helping American medical patients in the future." I found this very deep-and I do agree that by being more accepting we can have a better system for the ill and dying."
For Jay:
"I actually liked this post a lot because it took on a point of view that was not only different but also full of confidence. I especially liked the line, "I see it as capitalism at it's best. People seeing oppurtunity to profit where others do not." You make a good point about Capitalism and the point of the system is to profit. I found a lot of insights in your post and found it very interesting."
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comments on my HW#32:
From Mom:
"I really enjoyed this post. It was very clear and showed your reflection on what you felt toward the unit and the fear of death that still exists. I found this line very thoughful: "But, at the same time maybe there's no escape-and I'll just end up dying on a hospital bed wishing to be home surrounded by my family." We want our last moments to be a happy one, and sometimes its just scary to even think that it probably won't be. I agree that realistically as we grow old, we become more lonely while also hoping that the end of our lives won't be as lonesome."
From Stephanie:
"I was very impressed by this post, I sensed growth and a new level of maturity while reading through your final post about the unit. Just like you I am afraid what the future holds but I;m sure of one thing, I will not be dying in a nursing home or hospital. Your final thoughts were really strong and I enjoyed reading all your post about dying and illness. Keep up the great work!"
From Sarah:
"I found your post honest and real. Although you seem to have grown you still are unsure about how you want to lead your life, which is perfectly fine. I thought it was interesting that even after all we know about hospitals you still would go to one in a time of need. Honestly, I would probably do the same. I think your writing and insights have grown, and this is very evident especially in this post. Great Job Megumi! :)"
Saturday, January 22, 2011
HW#32: Thoughts following the Illness and Dying Unit
I felt this unit was important on a personal level. It was something I wouldn't have even tried to think about because 'death and illness' always seemed like a topic that should never be discussed. The unit made me feel a bit sad, because of the attitudes society as a whole has on sick people. It also makes me sad because I'm not sure if I'll be able to make changes just because I learned that going to the hospital isn't always the right answer. I was shocked learning that hospitals recommend patients to stay even when there's no more hope of getting better. Who would want to spend their last days in a hospital bed? But, at the same time maybe there's no escape-and I'll just end up dying on a hospital bed wishing to be home surrounded by my family.
I understand that death is unavoidable and that I should just accept it. And, I do, but the fear still lingers. I think it still lingers because I realized that there's more nightmarish things about illness and dying. Dying on a hospital bed is one thing. What about a nursing home? What happens if I end up in a nursing home where nurses keep their distance and don't keep me company? I can't help but think that when I become really old I'll end up feeling really lonely and away from the rest of the world. There's also 'stigmas' towards the ill which is something I don't want to go through but probably will. Why do we live in such a society that looks down on sick people? It's not like we want to be sick.
I understand that death is unavoidable and that I should just accept it. And, I do, but the fear still lingers. I think it still lingers because I realized that there's more nightmarish things about illness and dying. Dying on a hospital bed is one thing. What about a nursing home? What happens if I end up in a nursing home where nurses keep their distance and don't keep me company? I can't help but think that when I become really old I'll end up feeling really lonely and away from the rest of the world. There's also 'stigmas' towards the ill which is something I don't want to go through but probably will. Why do we live in such a society that looks down on sick people? It's not like we want to be sick.
Tuesday, January 18, 2011
HW#31: Comments 3
For Sarah:
I can tell from reading this whole post that you really put the effort in this project, and I enjoyed reading it a lot! Before reading the post, I only knew that alzheimer was an illness of 'forgetting everything'-but after reading your post I had a better understanding of the disease. I laughed a little when I read the little tips to prevent alzheimer and found that good to know. One line I found particularly insightful was, "however, if death is what our final destination is than are we really living or just dying? Society seems to make living out to be as normal and dying is completely not normal. Dying is completely normal, so why do we put such a strain on the step?" You brought up a good question here, and its a question up for discussion. When thinking and really analyzing death and living, we find the weirdness among what the general public just categorizes as 'normal.'
For Stephanie:
I enjoyed reading your post, and found it very descriptive. It helped me get a better understanding of what a nursing home is like. I found it ironic that people think its for the best to send ill patients to a nursing home without really putting ourselves in their shoes. I honestly don't even think the nurses care about their patients-they just do their 'job.' A line I liked specifically was, "This experience helped me realize I rather just take care of my parents when they need help instead of sending them to a nursing home, because I feel like its hard for the nurses and doctors to keep track of all the patients." I completely agree with you, and I personally don't like the idea of nursing homes-it makes me question if its really 'homelike.
For Jay:
I enjoyed reading your post-
I liked how your group focused on technology, which is really important. I liked the examples and quotes from different AIDS patients. In particular I liked the lines, "Another man we spoke with treated it like a death sentence at first but eventually came to be able to live with the disease, without modern technologies he wouldnt have had the time to learn to cope with his lifestyle." Technology has helped many patients with living with their diseases and lifestyles and I find that really insightful.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comments on my HW#30:
From Mom: (Older Reader)
I thought your post was very organized and clear. I found your statistics on Depression in the U.S. interesting and you also showed the seriousness of the condition through a family member. The line, "These insights connect to what I did for this project, because I think the social practice of allopathic medicine caused many to not take depression as a serious condition," actually caught my attention. I found your opinion interesting-that it is in our culture that dosn't take Depression seriously.
From Sarah:
Megumi - I found your choice of topic very interesting. I would of never considered depression to fall under the category of illness and dying, however after reading your post I see why it does. The line that stood out to me the most was, "The illness and dying unit made me uncomfortable most of the time, but helped me confront the things I have been avoiding." Being able to admit you feel uncomfortable is actually very mature, and shows that you accept your emotions and are willing to work with them. I think by exploring a topic that has affected you personally you continue to go up mountains that are unknown at first. The tone of your voice in this post was very clear and well written. Great Job! :)
From Stephanie:
Your first paragraph pulled me right in, I agree that if an illness doesn't affect someone first hand they tend not to pay to much attention to it. "The seriousness of depression and the statistics for it matters because it shows in the numbers. If depression is treated more often, suicide rates will decrease greatly." I found this statement to be very powerful because if people/ doctors help themselves/patients more often then the outcome would be tremendous and benefit a lot of people. Thank you for giving such great detail with you r research and ideas.
I can tell from reading this whole post that you really put the effort in this project, and I enjoyed reading it a lot! Before reading the post, I only knew that alzheimer was an illness of 'forgetting everything'-but after reading your post I had a better understanding of the disease. I laughed a little when I read the little tips to prevent alzheimer and found that good to know. One line I found particularly insightful was, "however, if death is what our final destination is than are we really living or just dying? Society seems to make living out to be as normal and dying is completely not normal. Dying is completely normal, so why do we put such a strain on the step?" You brought up a good question here, and its a question up for discussion. When thinking and really analyzing death and living, we find the weirdness among what the general public just categorizes as 'normal.'
For Stephanie:
I enjoyed reading your post, and found it very descriptive. It helped me get a better understanding of what a nursing home is like. I found it ironic that people think its for the best to send ill patients to a nursing home without really putting ourselves in their shoes. I honestly don't even think the nurses care about their patients-they just do their 'job.' A line I liked specifically was, "This experience helped me realize I rather just take care of my parents when they need help instead of sending them to a nursing home, because I feel like its hard for the nurses and doctors to keep track of all the patients." I completely agree with you, and I personally don't like the idea of nursing homes-it makes me question if its really 'homelike.
For Jay:
I enjoyed reading your post-
I liked how your group focused on technology, which is really important. I liked the examples and quotes from different AIDS patients. In particular I liked the lines, "Another man we spoke with treated it like a death sentence at first but eventually came to be able to live with the disease, without modern technologies he wouldnt have had the time to learn to cope with his lifestyle." Technology has helped many patients with living with their diseases and lifestyles and I find that really insightful.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comments on my HW#30:
From Mom: (Older Reader)
I thought your post was very organized and clear. I found your statistics on Depression in the U.S. interesting and you also showed the seriousness of the condition through a family member. The line, "These insights connect to what I did for this project, because I think the social practice of allopathic medicine caused many to not take depression as a serious condition," actually caught my attention. I found your opinion interesting-that it is in our culture that dosn't take Depression seriously.
From Sarah:
Megumi - I found your choice of topic very interesting. I would of never considered depression to fall under the category of illness and dying, however after reading your post I see why it does. The line that stood out to me the most was, "The illness and dying unit made me uncomfortable most of the time, but helped me confront the things I have been avoiding." Being able to admit you feel uncomfortable is actually very mature, and shows that you accept your emotions and are willing to work with them. I think by exploring a topic that has affected you personally you continue to go up mountains that are unknown at first. The tone of your voice in this post was very clear and well written. Great Job! :)
From Stephanie:
Your first paragraph pulled me right in, I agree that if an illness doesn't affect someone first hand they tend not to pay to much attention to it. "The seriousness of depression and the statistics for it matters because it shows in the numbers. If depression is treated more often, suicide rates will decrease greatly." I found this statement to be very powerful because if people/ doctors help themselves/patients more often then the outcome would be tremendous and benefit a lot of people. Thank you for giving such great detail with you r research and ideas.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)